There are some aspects that are unconventional and are difficult to translate into film. A movie that is primarily flashbacks to characters who die, for instance.JRR_Talking said:are the tales thrilling /scarey / exciting enough for a modern audience?
JRR_Talking said:not read any books or played the game to any extent,
could it be that the books/stories just dont translate well to the big screen?
are the tales thrilling /scarey / exciting enough for a modern audience?
John
D.Shaffer said:That and a big component of Lovecraft critters is that he doesnt really describe them in detail. When a movie tries to portray one of these critters, it inevitably comes out as looking cheesy. They compound the problem by showing us the monster in all its bright lit glory.
Another issue is the monster is often the climax of Lovecraft's work. Movie adaptions seem to want to make it the focus, turning any adaptions into yet another monster movie.
Heh. I was originally going to mention Alien but decided to cut the comment.Templetroll said:Correct, Lovecraft's style is exactly what made Jaws and Alien great. Slow build of suspence, see what the monster did, not the monster. You didn't see the BBM until the last part of the movie.
Eric Anondson said:TThe Outsider and The Rats in the Walls read that night still give her nightmares more than a decade later. She's easily susceptible to nightmares though.![]()
sniffles said: