Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="No Name" data-source="post: 5365643" data-attributes="member: 31462">How is this change going to make things better for me? The way our group is setup now isn't going to change. Two of us in the gaming group are subscribers, although that may change. And only the two of us own any books or minis. The rest of the group will now store their characters on one or both of our accounts. And they still won't subscribe. So there's no real difference there. Other than needing internet. So it's a little more restrictive. Not good for me, I'm not a fan of "restrictive." Unless Wizards goes to a "must subscribe to play" model (Dungeons of Dragoncraft), they won't get any more cash from us (and they definately won't get it then). Seeing how only one player needs to be a subscriber for everyone to access the CB, I'm tempted to cancel. Dungeon and Dragon are drying up. I don't like the online CB move. I can't store my characters offline (they're working on that - it will be available "soon" <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/rant.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rant:" title="Rant    :rant:" data-shortname=":rant:" />). Honestly, I don't mind $6 a month for an offline CB and MB. I would keep subscribing just for that. I like good magazines, but I could live without them. And I'd still pay $6 a month for the offline apps. I've been a subscriber since the beginning. Only one time did I use one of the five CB installs on a computer that wasn't mine. Only once. I guess the point is WotC thinks this move will net them more cash. It's not about making the game more enjoyable for me.</blockquote>

Verification