Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kramodlog" data-source="post: 6622099" data-attributes="member: 55961">Um... That is not a rebuttle to what I said. I didn't say the CEO lied.&nbsp; Cause Mistwell said so it is accurate? Please. There is context that his rebuttle doesn't adress. Read the transcript. The CEO was answering follow up questions to the presentation. When D&amp;D was mentioned to answer a follow up question to one of the follow up questions. It wasn't in the initial presentation. So probably not veeted and it doesn't need to cause material increase to Hasbro. It does not invalidates the &quot;sudden surge in revenues theory&quot;. <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/3083146-hasbro-has-brian-d-goldner-on-q1-2015-results-earnings-call-transcript?page=5&amp;p=qanda&amp;l=last" target="_blank">http://seekingalpha.com/article/3083146-hasbro-has-brian-d-goldner-on-q1-2015-results-earnings-call-transcript?page=5&amp;p=qanda&amp;l=last</a>The guy was asking if revenues for some brands came from the direct sells of toys or from royalties from all the crap that comes with brands (e.g. films). The CEO says that the revenues (or sells, not sure) from Games have been flat except for the ones mentioned, including D&amp;D that is a on a tear. It is more complicated than just being a case of &quot;it needs to give Hasbro increase material gain to be mentioned&quot;. So, revenues (or sells) are up. Yeah, they are selling more than they use too. We know that. What it actually means, we do not know exactly what a tear means and what is the context. They would be getting money from a product we do not know exist?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kramodlog, post: 6622099, member: 55961"] Um... That is not a rebuttle to what I said. I didn't say the CEO lied. Cause Mistwell said so it is accurate? Please. There is context that his rebuttle doesn't adress. Read the transcript. The CEO was answering follow up questions to the presentation. When D&D was mentioned to answer a follow up question to one of the follow up questions. It wasn't in the initial presentation. So probably not veeted and it doesn't need to cause material increase to Hasbro. It does not invalidates the "sudden surge in revenues theory". [url]http://seekingalpha.com/article/3083146-hasbro-has-brian-d-goldner-on-q1-2015-results-earnings-call-transcript?page=5&p=qanda&l=last[/url] The guy was asking if revenues for some brands came from the direct sells of toys or from royalties from all the crap that comes with brands (e.g. films). The CEO says that the revenues (or sells, not sure) from Games have been flat except for the ones mentioned, including D&D that is a on a tear. It is more complicated than just being a case of "it needs to give Hasbro increase material gain to be mentioned". So, revenues (or sells) are up. Yeah, they are selling more than they use too. We know that. What it actually means, we do not know exactly what a tear means and what is the context. They would be getting money from a product we do not know exist? [/QUOTE]

Verification