Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I want smaller, leaner core books.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crit" data-source="post: 8142769" data-attributes="member: 7027023"><p>I'm not a graphic designer, but I could see spacing and whatnot being valuable to edit. Aside from that, many of the basic features like duration/range/components/casting time are listed in separate lines with the labels restated. </p><p></p><p>Here's what I'd do for Eldritch Blast. </p><p>-------------------</p><p><strong>Eldritch Blast</strong> <em>evocation cantrip</em></p><p>1 Action | 120 ft | V,S | Instantaneous*</p><p></p><p>Launch a beam of crackling energy. Make a ranged spell attack: on a hit, the target takes 1d10 force damage. </p><p>At 5th level, a second bolt is created by the spell, with a third at 11th level and a fourth at 17th level, which can target the same or different creatures. Each bolt requires a separate attack roll. </p><p></p><p><em>Warlock, x, y, z...</em></p><p>--------------------</p><p><em>*(Each "section" of the above would have been on separate lines, increasing vertical height drastically.)</em></p><p></p><p>While I can't account for font changes affecting size, I did noticeably trim the word count and eliminate unnecessary line breaks, so it's smaller however you look at it. I can imagine that other spells might have similar possible reductions, and all together it would equate to a more noticeable reduction in page count at little to no cost. It's not any harder to read. </p><p></p><p>With that said, I do feel there are some redundancies in spell options <em>but </em>there'd probably be a way to adjust the way those are listed. </p><p></p><p>Thunderclap, Sword Burst and one other cantrip are the same spell, other than the damage they do and the save they force the enemy to make- if there were a way to list what they have in common, and merely list the deviation, that would save space and potentially invite home-brew or something. This is a hypothetical, I don't have to make a new system.</p><p></p><p>In theory it would be something like this:</p><p>--------</p><p>(name of this type of cantrip)</p><p>1 action / 5 ft / S / Instantaneous</p><p>Each creature within range must make succeed on a save or take 1d6 damage. The save and damage types are listed below, as well as additional information for spell affects and requirements.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">(Remaining thunderclap info, like class restriction + damage/save, + the sound)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">(remaining Sword Burst Info, like other components)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">(whatever the third one was)</li> </ul><p>---------</p><p>If all of this was listed like that, 3 entries (I approximate) would take the space of one and a third, which means that you could fit in even more spells! If we were to move onward, I could see this going for other spells like shape water/control flame + other elements, or Fire Bolt + EB, and maybe other elements. </p><p>This is already how things are listed in 5e. You don't see a separate whole-thing for each subclass- you have a class, list what's in common, and then it's more efficient to just show how it narrows from there. Even in the Monster Manual, they just give you a template for shadow dragons and dracoliches, which can be merged with the existing stat blocks of whichever dragon. When you put it like that, you get <em>way </em>more individual dragon types than you have actual stat blocks for, so this principle could be applied in magic for more flexibility without ballooning listed information. </p><p></p><p>IMO, the standard character sheet and most monster stat blocks could do with reformatting for space/ease of reference, but that's for another time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crit, post: 8142769, member: 7027023"] I'm not a graphic designer, but I could see spacing and whatnot being valuable to edit. Aside from that, many of the basic features like duration/range/components/casting time are listed in separate lines with the labels restated. Here's what I'd do for Eldritch Blast. ------------------- [B]Eldritch Blast[/B] [I]evocation cantrip[/I] 1 Action | 120 ft | V,S | Instantaneous* Launch a beam of crackling energy. Make a ranged spell attack: on a hit, the target takes 1d10 force damage. At 5th level, a second bolt is created by the spell, with a third at 11th level and a fourth at 17th level, which can target the same or different creatures. Each bolt requires a separate attack roll. [I]Warlock, x, y, z...[/I] -------------------- [I]*(Each "section" of the above would have been on separate lines, increasing vertical height drastically.)[/I] While I can't account for font changes affecting size, I did noticeably trim the word count and eliminate unnecessary line breaks, so it's smaller however you look at it. I can imagine that other spells might have similar possible reductions, and all together it would equate to a more noticeable reduction in page count at little to no cost. It's not any harder to read. With that said, I do feel there are some redundancies in spell options [I]but [/I]there'd probably be a way to adjust the way those are listed. Thunderclap, Sword Burst and one other cantrip are the same spell, other than the damage they do and the save they force the enemy to make- if there were a way to list what they have in common, and merely list the deviation, that would save space and potentially invite home-brew or something. This is a hypothetical, I don't have to make a new system. In theory it would be something like this: -------- (name of this type of cantrip) 1 action / 5 ft / S / Instantaneous Each creature within range must make succeed on a save or take 1d6 damage. The save and damage types are listed below, as well as additional information for spell affects and requirements. [LIST] [*](Remaining thunderclap info, like class restriction + damage/save, + the sound) [*](remaining Sword Burst Info, like other components) [*](whatever the third one was) [/LIST] --------- If all of this was listed like that, 3 entries (I approximate) would take the space of one and a third, which means that you could fit in even more spells! If we were to move onward, I could see this going for other spells like shape water/control flame + other elements, or Fire Bolt + EB, and maybe other elements. This is already how things are listed in 5e. You don't see a separate whole-thing for each subclass- you have a class, list what's in common, and then it's more efficient to just show how it narrows from there. Even in the Monster Manual, they just give you a template for shadow dragons and dracoliches, which can be merged with the existing stat blocks of whichever dragon. When you put it like that, you get [I]way [/I]more individual dragon types than you have actual stat blocks for, so this principle could be applied in magic for more flexibility without ballooning listed information. IMO, the standard character sheet and most monster stat blocks could do with reformatting for space/ease of reference, but that's for another time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I want smaller, leaner core books.
Top