Shortman McLeod
First Post
MerricB said:If you consider the power level to be too steep - as I now do - it's a fundamental problem.
That's personal preference, not a "fundamental" problem.
MerricB said:If you consider the power level to be too steep - as I now do - it's a fundamental problem.
Dude, people have been talking about the fundamental problems with 3.5 for years now. Find a new riff.Shortman McLeod said:Exactly. No one was saying that 3.5 had "huge, deep, fundamental brokenness" until WotC told them it did.
Sigh.![]()
Say what? Of course we have. We just didn't have a forum devoted to the concept until WotC announced 4e.Shortman McLeod said:Exactly. No one was saying that 3.5 had "huge, deep, fundamental brokenness" until WotC told them it did.
What's wrong with playing a D&D game using core-only (specifically three core rulebooks)? :\Psion said:But, as I disdain core only games as it is,...
Ranger REG said:What's wrong with playing a D&D game using core-only (specifically three core rulebooks)? :\
Trust me, there will be supplements. History have shown that there is no way you can cover all topics and themes in just three volumes ... and keep the set less than $100.charlesatan said:Nothing wrong with playing a core-only game. =) It's just some people prefer to play the game with more options (hence supplements).
Ranger REG said:What's wrong with playing a D&D game using core-only (specifically three core rulebooks)? :\
Monkey Boy said:A few weeks ago no one was talking about math being a problem.
That's his problem. I don't want psionics in my D&D. If he wants to consider a PsiHB as the fourth core rulebook to be part of core only, I have no objection.Scholar & Brutalman said:You're asking someone called Psion this question?
Monkey Boy said:The problems are not deep and fundamental.