Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If the characters are super optimized should the monsters be boosted too?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pming" data-source="post: 6662179" data-attributes="member: 45197"><p>Hiya!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>-in regards to the <strong>boldface</strong>- *DING DING DING!* We have a winner! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Y'See... Feats are <strong><em><u>OPTIONAL</u></em></strong> in the 5e rules. They are NOT considered with regards to ANYTHING in the game, because, well, they are <em>assumed to NOT be used</em>. If you are using them, it is up to you to adjust what needs adjusting. In general, this means more work for the DM, more time spend by the DM writing stuff out, more time and effort spent trying to remember what character can do what, and, IMHO, more of a headache than letting players moan and whine for a session about not being able to use Feats. Feats are like crack to players... once they start, they will only want more and more, eventually trying to "sneak stuff by" other players and DM's via unusual rules interpretations and eventually getting to the outright point of just cheating/omission (e.g, <em>"What? I only get to choose one feat at level 8? I thought it was a Feat in place of a +1 to a stat, and you get +2 stat bonuses. Sorry...but, well, my character is already established, can I just knock down my Charisma by 2 points to balance it out?"</em> ).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> I suppose you kinda have to, don't you? However, in the end, you're players will likely hate you for it (or otherwise feel you "suck at DM'ing"). In their crack-addled...er... "Feat-addled" brains, the core reason for carefully choosing Feats, weapons, classes and spells is to easily overcome bad guys. They're thinking "I do 10 damage, and it takes me 3 rounds to kill Monster Type A...If I take this Feat, that class ability, and the wizard casts Spell Y on me, I can do 33 damage and kill it in one round! Yeah...I'll do that!". The very <em>moment</em> you try and balance it out by, say, adding two more of the monsters, so they are back to square one (re: it still takes them 3 rounds to 'win'), they will start taking notice. The more powerful they get, the more balance you have to introduce, the more pissed off they will get at the "uselessness of taking Feats".</p><p></p><p> IMHO, you should adjust play style so that the BBEG doesn't simply involve "fighting more BBEG's". That is, set up the story so that they <em>can</em> choose to just lay waste to the dragons, but if they choose to parley with them they get a LOT more benefit. In stead of putting in more monsters or monsters with more HP's, put things in place that require the PLAYERS to think and make decisions based on more than just what their characters can do. Start introducing NPC's, locations, animals, or whatever, that the PLAYERS actually become emotionally attached to (or at least invested in). Of course, you are likely to end up in almost the same situation... with the players being annoyed and throwing up their hands, claiming <em>"Whats the point of taking Feats if they aren't going to really matter?"</em>. But at least this way they may care less and less about taking them, but care more and more about everything else that a full-bodied D&D campaign (re: the exploration, the NPC's, and all the other verisimilitude of choice available in an RPG).</p><p></p><p>Bottom Line: Just don't use feats. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Me? I told my players: <em>Go ahead and choose Feats if you want... but I <u>will</u> deliberately, purposefully, and with great joy, pleasure and satisfaction, balance out *your characters* foes against you; so if you get +10 to damage, I'll just give them +10 hp times a number of rounds they would have likely lasted against you without that +10 -- so if it would have taken you 3 rounds to kill it normally, it will have +30 hp against *your PC*. In short... think of Feats as a zero-sum game. You will NEVER be "more powerful"...your feats will be primarily for flavour and role-playing; mechanics will be far, FAR down on the list of bonuses, in the end."</em> At first my players were like "What?!? That's stupid! Whats the point?!?. Now, however, only some have feats and those feats "fit the character". They get the Sharpshooter to shoot a message-arrow through a small broken pane of glass in the bandit-lords hideout because they see it as "A cool thing you'd see in a movie or read in a story"... but they don't assume the Sharpshooter is going to lay waste to said bandit lord with a bajillion killer arrow shots in two rounds when they meet him. Because, well, they know I'm going to 'fix it' so that that doesn't happen. They know it will be fair, and they know to try and use the feats for "flavour and story purposes first, being more powerful a distant second". Next campaign, however, no Feats as a base.</p><p></p><p></p><p>PS: Sorry if I re-iterated something others have said; didn't have time to read all the pages as I have to head out to the in-laws to try and fix a tail light on my van.</p><p></p><p>^_^</p><p></p><p>Paul L. Ming</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pming, post: 6662179, member: 45197"] Hiya! -in regards to the [B]boldface[/B]- *DING DING DING!* We have a winner! ;) Y'See... Feats are [B][I][U]OPTIONAL[/U][/I][/B] in the 5e rules. They are NOT considered with regards to ANYTHING in the game, because, well, they are [I]assumed to NOT be used[/I]. If you are using them, it is up to you to adjust what needs adjusting. In general, this means more work for the DM, more time spend by the DM writing stuff out, more time and effort spent trying to remember what character can do what, and, IMHO, more of a headache than letting players moan and whine for a session about not being able to use Feats. Feats are like crack to players... once they start, they will only want more and more, eventually trying to "sneak stuff by" other players and DM's via unusual rules interpretations and eventually getting to the outright point of just cheating/omission (e.g, [I]"What? I only get to choose one feat at level 8? I thought it was a Feat in place of a +1 to a stat, and you get +2 stat bonuses. Sorry...but, well, my character is already established, can I just knock down my Charisma by 2 points to balance it out?"[/I] ). I suppose you kinda have to, don't you? However, in the end, you're players will likely hate you for it (or otherwise feel you "suck at DM'ing"). In their crack-addled...er... "Feat-addled" brains, the core reason for carefully choosing Feats, weapons, classes and spells is to easily overcome bad guys. They're thinking "I do 10 damage, and it takes me 3 rounds to kill Monster Type A...If I take this Feat, that class ability, and the wizard casts Spell Y on me, I can do 33 damage and kill it in one round! Yeah...I'll do that!". The very [I]moment[/I] you try and balance it out by, say, adding two more of the monsters, so they are back to square one (re: it still takes them 3 rounds to 'win'), they will start taking notice. The more powerful they get, the more balance you have to introduce, the more pissed off they will get at the "uselessness of taking Feats". IMHO, you should adjust play style so that the BBEG doesn't simply involve "fighting more BBEG's". That is, set up the story so that they [I]can[/I] choose to just lay waste to the dragons, but if they choose to parley with them they get a LOT more benefit. In stead of putting in more monsters or monsters with more HP's, put things in place that require the PLAYERS to think and make decisions based on more than just what their characters can do. Start introducing NPC's, locations, animals, or whatever, that the PLAYERS actually become emotionally attached to (or at least invested in). Of course, you are likely to end up in almost the same situation... with the players being annoyed and throwing up their hands, claiming [I]"Whats the point of taking Feats if they aren't going to really matter?"[/I]. But at least this way they may care less and less about taking them, but care more and more about everything else that a full-bodied D&D campaign (re: the exploration, the NPC's, and all the other verisimilitude of choice available in an RPG). Bottom Line: Just don't use feats. :) Me? I told my players: [I]Go ahead and choose Feats if you want... but I [U]will[/U] deliberately, purposefully, and with great joy, pleasure and satisfaction, balance out *your characters* foes against you; so if you get +10 to damage, I'll just give them +10 hp times a number of rounds they would have likely lasted against you without that +10 -- so if it would have taken you 3 rounds to kill it normally, it will have +30 hp against *your PC*. In short... think of Feats as a zero-sum game. You will NEVER be "more powerful"...your feats will be primarily for flavour and role-playing; mechanics will be far, FAR down on the list of bonuses, in the end."[/I] At first my players were like "What?!? That's stupid! Whats the point?!?. Now, however, only some have feats and those feats "fit the character". They get the Sharpshooter to shoot a message-arrow through a small broken pane of glass in the bandit-lords hideout because they see it as "A cool thing you'd see in a movie or read in a story"... but they don't assume the Sharpshooter is going to lay waste to said bandit lord with a bajillion killer arrow shots in two rounds when they meet him. Because, well, they know I'm going to 'fix it' so that that doesn't happen. They know it will be fair, and they know to try and use the feats for "flavour and story purposes first, being more powerful a distant second". Next campaign, however, no Feats as a base. PS: Sorry if I re-iterated something others have said; didn't have time to read all the pages as I have to head out to the in-laws to try and fix a tail light on my van. ^_^ Paul L. Ming [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If the characters are super optimized should the monsters be boosted too?
Top