Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GuardianLurker" data-source="post: 2433846" data-attributes="member: 786">Second on the automate. It's not the number of rolls that's really the problem, it's the lookup time - especially for the poor GM. Really the problem is all the page flipping you have to do; find a way to reduce/eliminate it and it'd be good.This is *especially* true for monsters - a simple claw/claw/bite routine could involve as many as 4-6 tables, and that's before considering all the secondary/tertiary/conditional attack compilications. Another problem are the Magic/Large/Super-large crit tables - I feel that these should ideally be expressed as modifiers to the normal crit rolls rather than as separate tables.On a different, slightly related note, how to RMSS and HARP hit points compare, scale-wise?</blockquote>