Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If you use thunderstep but teleport less than 10 feet do you take damage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8585656" data-attributes="member: 7032025"><p>Since, ultimately, the spell teleports you, you indeed reappear, the question is WHEN. Moreover, if you read the spell, there is circumstantial evidence that you appear: "You can bring along objects as long as their weight doesn’t exceed what you can carry. You can also teleport one willing creature of your size or smaller who is carrying gear up to its carrying capacity. The creature must be within 5 feet of you when you cast this spell, and there must be an unoccupied space within 5 feet of your destination space <strong><u><span style="color: rgb(209, 72, 65)">for the creature to appear in</span></u></strong>; otherwise, the creature is left behind."</p><p></p><p>Since you are taking the creature <strong><u>along</u></strong>, it's logical that you also appear. So there is, clearly, in as many words, in the spell description: a disappearance, a boom, and an appearance. Do you deny this, that the three appear separately ?</p><p></p><p>Now, since there are three things, there is an order, and the boom is "Immediately after you disappear". So the order is clearly that the thunder is AFTER the disappearance, and because it is IMMEDIATELY after, the logical conclusion is that the appearance, since it cannot be before the disappearance, is ALSO after the boom.</p><p></p><p>I don't see any flaw in this, from what is written in the spell.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Your tone is extremely disagreeable, and totally unjustified, as proven above, there IS a reappearance. Guess who is in a spot of trouble, now ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since when "disappearance" is a synonym for teleportation ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And this just proves that you have not even read the spell to its very end. Q.E.D.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Then, please, live by your own words, be gone, and don't reappear.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's funny, because you are certainly trying, but totally failing, since your only argument is that the appearance is not mentioned. Too bad it is, explicitely...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry, no, the onus is for you to prove that instantly means what you think it means. For example, the spell happens instantly, in an instant, and STILL there is a sequence, because the boom is only AFTER the disappearance. Now, please deny that "instantly" means that there is no sequence, It's going to be funny.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lyxen, post: 8585656, member: 7032025"] Since, ultimately, the spell teleports you, you indeed reappear, the question is WHEN. Moreover, if you read the spell, there is circumstantial evidence that you appear: "You can bring along objects as long as their weight doesn’t exceed what you can carry. You can also teleport one willing creature of your size or smaller who is carrying gear up to its carrying capacity. The creature must be within 5 feet of you when you cast this spell, and there must be an unoccupied space within 5 feet of your destination space [B][U][COLOR=rgb(209, 72, 65)]for the creature to appear in[/COLOR][/U][/B]; otherwise, the creature is left behind." Since you are taking the creature [B][U]along[/U][/B], it's logical that you also appear. So there is, clearly, in as many words, in the spell description: a disappearance, a boom, and an appearance. Do you deny this, that the three appear separately ? Now, since there are three things, there is an order, and the boom is "Immediately after you disappear". So the order is clearly that the thunder is AFTER the disappearance, and because it is IMMEDIATELY after, the logical conclusion is that the appearance, since it cannot be before the disappearance, is ALSO after the boom. I don't see any flaw in this, from what is written in the spell. Your tone is extremely disagreeable, and totally unjustified, as proven above, there IS a reappearance. Guess who is in a spot of trouble, now ? Since when "disappearance" is a synonym for teleportation ? And this just proves that you have not even read the spell to its very end. Q.E.D. Then, please, live by your own words, be gone, and don't reappear. It's funny, because you are certainly trying, but totally failing, since your only argument is that the appearance is not mentioned. Too bad it is, explicitely... Sorry, no, the onus is for you to prove that instantly means what you think it means. For example, the spell happens instantly, in an instant, and STILL there is a sequence, because the boom is only AFTER the disappearance. Now, please deny that "instantly" means that there is no sequence, It's going to be funny. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If you use thunderstep but teleport less than 10 feet do you take damage?
Top