Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If you use thunderstep but teleport less than 10 feet do you take damage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8590621" data-attributes="member: 7032025"><p>I did not say <u>where</u> it was inserted, it might be in the end or it might be in the middle, that's all.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And then again, no, it does not say "after the teleport", once more. It does not say "then" either. You are inventing things.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And still, it mentions SPECIFICALLY the reappearance, not a teleportation as a whole.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because you seem to insist that they are synonyms. They simply are not.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Good, as they are parts, they can be split apart, that's all that I'm arguing for. They do not have to be, but they can.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Are you kidding me ? It's exactly what most dictionaries do, look at "instantaneous" in most dictionaries, and you will find "instant" in there.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, do not change the words for the authors. "In an instant" is as clear as "about six seconds", which means not really clear at all. It's an open game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And again, you have not proven at all that is is zero time. Whereas the proof exist that it is NOT zero time, because the boom occurs AFTER the disappearance. So there is a sequence, it's not all simultaneous in zero time.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would argue that zero is much more measurable that "an instant" or "about six seconds".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's the advantage of "an instant" for open rules. It can be cut into as many other instants as required for narration.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Mathematically, this is false, by the way. 0 is a multiple of 0 by any number.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which proves you immediately wrong, as Thunder step is an instantaneous spell that has, RAW, two parts <u>in sequence</u>. Hence your hypothesis is immediately shown to be wrong.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And this is not the word used. Nor is it the definition given for instantaneous in the rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>FIne, but once more, you are not using the definition of the rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh, yes, does it make the "teleport" spell a reference ? No, they don't, they refer to "teleportation effects", that's all...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because it just goes to show exactly what I said, that you can't use a spell as a reference in another spell unless made explicit.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which still does not put any one particular spell as a reference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lyxen, post: 8590621, member: 7032025"] I did not say [U]where[/U] it was inserted, it might be in the end or it might be in the middle, that's all. And then again, no, it does not say "after the teleport", once more. It does not say "then" either. You are inventing things. And still, it mentions SPECIFICALLY the reappearance, not a teleportation as a whole. Because you seem to insist that they are synonyms. They simply are not. Good, as they are parts, they can be split apart, that's all that I'm arguing for. They do not have to be, but they can. Are you kidding me ? It's exactly what most dictionaries do, look at "instantaneous" in most dictionaries, and you will find "instant" in there. Again, do not change the words for the authors. "In an instant" is as clear as "about six seconds", which means not really clear at all. It's an open game. And again, you have not proven at all that is is zero time. Whereas the proof exist that it is NOT zero time, because the boom occurs AFTER the disappearance. So there is a sequence, it's not all simultaneous in zero time. I would argue that zero is much more measurable that "an instant" or "about six seconds". That's the advantage of "an instant" for open rules. It can be cut into as many other instants as required for narration. Mathematically, this is false, by the way. 0 is a multiple of 0 by any number. Which proves you immediately wrong, as Thunder step is an instantaneous spell that has, RAW, two parts [U]in sequence[/U]. Hence your hypothesis is immediately shown to be wrong. And this is not the word used. Nor is it the definition given for instantaneous in the rules. FIne, but once more, you are not using the definition of the rules. Oh, yes, does it make the "teleport" spell a reference ? No, they don't, they refer to "teleportation effects", that's all... Because it just goes to show exactly what I said, that you can't use a spell as a reference in another spell unless made explicit. Which still does not put any one particular spell as a reference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If you use thunderstep but teleport less than 10 feet do you take damage?
Top