Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I'm done with 3.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Edgewood" data-source="post: 3585865" data-attributes="member: 20132"><p>A lot of what I have read from most people (and these are entirely valid opinions in my book) is that I can certainly do away with the options in D&D and stick to the 3 core books. I am in complete agreement with that statement. As they say on the Colbert Report, it has a sort of "truthiness" to it. </p><p>My reasons for dropping this version are of course quite personal in that I find that the push for purchasing the splatbooks for D&D is always there. When you have X players who are continuously buying these books and want to use them in the game, you can't help but generate a little resentment by saying, "sorry, we're just sticking to the 3 core books and that's it." Even if I make that absolutely clear at the beginning of a campaign and all players agree to it, the desire to eventually bring in new options will slowly creep in. It's part of the culture of D&D to bring in these options to keep the line viable. </p><p></p><p>Do I have a choice? Of course I do. And I know that maybe my arguements may be somewhat slanted, but really, who's aren't really. I don't think many people can make a completely even arguement without biases slipping in. It's human nature. </p><p></p><p>I would like to thank everyone for their input. EnWorld has proven once again why it is such a useful community. I got to see differernt sides to this issue in a very open and kind manner. Heck, the UN wished they had it so good.</p><p></p><p>Keep Smilin' <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Edgewood, post: 3585865, member: 20132"] A lot of what I have read from most people (and these are entirely valid opinions in my book) is that I can certainly do away with the options in D&D and stick to the 3 core books. I am in complete agreement with that statement. As they say on the Colbert Report, it has a sort of "truthiness" to it. My reasons for dropping this version are of course quite personal in that I find that the push for purchasing the splatbooks for D&D is always there. When you have X players who are continuously buying these books and want to use them in the game, you can't help but generate a little resentment by saying, "sorry, we're just sticking to the 3 core books and that's it." Even if I make that absolutely clear at the beginning of a campaign and all players agree to it, the desire to eventually bring in new options will slowly creep in. It's part of the culture of D&D to bring in these options to keep the line viable. Do I have a choice? Of course I do. And I know that maybe my arguements may be somewhat slanted, but really, who's aren't really. I don't think many people can make a completely even arguement without biases slipping in. It's human nature. I would like to thank everyone for their input. EnWorld has proven once again why it is such a useful community. I got to see differernt sides to this issue in a very open and kind manner. Heck, the UN wished they had it so good. Keep Smilin' :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I'm done with 3.5
Top