Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="chobin foot" data-source="post: 3601797" data-attributes="member: 51927">Well, I didn't claim that Wizards didn't innovate.For me, I think other companies do it better.As a matter of taste, I don't find that Wizards are at the top of the craft of D20 and D20 supplements... there's a lot of variance in their output. Certainly, there was an avalanche of bad D20 supplements, but who is putting out the avalanche now?Tastes differ, for certain. D&D just isn't my game of choice, and it doesn't mean that I'm somehow stupid or lesser than Wizards patrons... nor that D&D-haters are any better at roleplaying than D&D-players. I just don't want to use 3.5 to run what I want out of a D20 game, although it doesn't mean that I don't want to buy the occasional Wizards product myself.I think it's sort of a misconception to say that because some person doesn't like 3.5, they're just doing it wrong. Matters of taste aren't misunderstandings or stupidity on the part of other people. Sometimes you just think some crap tastes good, and other crap tastes bad.Everyone doesn't have to love Wizards. (I have no love for them, nor any hate for them. I think I said in the "Wizards brand" topic that I simply don't have any brand loyalty to "Wizards brand" at this point, although there are one or two "Wizards brand" hardcovers that I do want to pick up at some point)...(The full color books... they don't do it for me. Not just Wizards, but also Green Ronin's Mutants & Masterminds, for instance. Give me cheaper print in black & white, and an inexpensive color PDF or an art archive online. And economies of scale don't just have to refer to the end production run.)</blockquote>

Verification