Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
I'm really concerned about 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DaveMage" data-source="post: 3822835" data-attributes="member: 10447"><p>Here's the way I see it.</p><p></p><p>I have no problem with someone making money, but I do have a problem when design decisions are (potentially) greatly impacted by monetary concerns. Sure, there has to be some consideration, but in this case I feel it seems to go to far.</p><p></p><p>For example, they want PHB1, PHB2, and PHB3 to all be considered "core". So, in order to sell *all* those books, they are "holding out" some races or classes to be used in later volumes. </p><p></p><p>Second, as mentioned, the DI nickel-and-dime potential:</p><p></p><p>Look! Here are cool virtual minis to use with your $9.99/month DI subscription! Oh, but, sorry, if you actually want to USE these minis, well, they cost extra. Oh, and by the way, you'll have to buy them in random virtual packs. (WTF!?!?! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> ) Now, hopefully WotC will give up this nonsensical idea and make everything available under the DI at their monthly $9.99. However, the more I hear about this edition, the more I'm convinced that the folks in charge of the purse strings are not interested in good value for the gamer - they're interested in separating as much money from the gamer as possible. </p><p></p><p>For those of you who are going 4e, hopefully, I'm completely wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DaveMage, post: 3822835, member: 10447"] Here's the way I see it. I have no problem with someone making money, but I do have a problem when design decisions are (potentially) greatly impacted by monetary concerns. Sure, there has to be some consideration, but in this case I feel it seems to go to far. For example, they want PHB1, PHB2, and PHB3 to all be considered "core". So, in order to sell *all* those books, they are "holding out" some races or classes to be used in later volumes. Second, as mentioned, the DI nickel-and-dime potential: Look! Here are cool virtual minis to use with your $9.99/month DI subscription! Oh, but, sorry, if you actually want to USE these minis, well, they cost extra. Oh, and by the way, you'll have to buy them in random virtual packs. (WTF!?!?! :confused: ) Now, hopefully WotC will give up this nonsensical idea and make everything available under the DI at their monthly $9.99. However, the more I hear about this edition, the more I'm convinced that the folks in charge of the purse strings are not interested in good value for the gamer - they're interested in separating as much money from the gamer as possible. For those of you who are going 4e, hopefully, I'm completely wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
I'm really concerned about 4E
Top