Upper_Krust
Legend
Hi Anubis mate! 
I hope you have been keeping well?
Feel as free to point them out as I will to easily debunk them mate!
You understand when you make these sweeping statements in upper case format it just makes the eventual smackdown that much sweeter.
Okay lets assume a party of four 1st-level PCs with default array ability scores (15; 14; 13; 12; 10; 8).
Individual PC CR 1 + 1.2 for ability scores = CR 2.2 (CR 2)
CR 2 = EL 5
Four PCs = EL +4 (PEL = EL-4)
Therefore PEL = 5
The bugbear represents a moderate encounter (EL +/-0). The PCs should win easily.
Try not to forget that the PC Encounter Level is modified the same as Monster EL.
Not at all.
It is both necessary and hardly overtly pedantic given its almost never going to have a negligable effect.
At all non-permanent effects and magic items as I specified.
Did you miss the sidebar pointed out in the document I gave you!? All this is already explained I fail to see where your confusion stems from!?
Personally I wouldn't count them. Simply because they are part of your wealth allowance.
No I'm not double taxing stuff - you are!
Ability Scores are pertinent.
IT WAS YOU WHO INITIALLY POINTED THIS OUT TO ME!
Actually the total opposite is true. If you assign EXP by CR, THEN you are screwing them out of EXP.
eg. Are you trying to say 109th-level characters should gain no EXP from defeating 100th-level opponents even though we know the difference in power is negligable!?
The Core Rules don't give anywhere near an accurate outline of mixed opponents.
I appreciate your help mate - though I think I have everything under control.
Keep trying to break the system though; its always possible I have missed something.
Judging by your above arguments - its all good.
What problem with normal races?

I hope you have been keeping well?
Anubis said:UK, sorry to do this, but I still have to point out some obvious flaws in your system regarding lower levels.
Feel as free to point them out as I will to easily debunk them mate!

Anubis said:I point you to the bugbear, CR 2 by the book, CR 2.2 by your system. Your system would also suggest that a single bugbear is an EL 5 encounter. Um, sorry, but that is OBVIOUSLY not the case.
You understand when you make these sweeping statements in upper case format it just makes the eventual smackdown that much sweeter.

Anubis said:A standard level 1 party could defeat a bugbear with only minor difficulty.
Okay lets assume a party of four 1st-level PCs with default array ability scores (15; 14; 13; 12; 10; 8).
Individual PC CR 1 + 1.2 for ability scores = CR 2.2 (CR 2)
CR 2 = EL 5
Four PCs = EL +4 (PEL = EL-4)
Therefore PEL = 5
The bugbear represents a moderate encounter (EL +/-0). The PCs should win easily.
Anubis said:In fact, the ONLY current CR 2 monsters worthy of an EL 5 mark are the ogre and the loxo, and I think even they are only a 3 or 4.
Try not to forget that the PC Encounter Level is modified the same as Monster EL.
Anubis said:I still think messing with the lower levels is a bad idea.
Not at all.
Anubis said:I also think that taking the rolles ability scores into consideration for purposes of determining PEL is pedantic and unnecessary.
It is both necessary and hardly overtly pedantic given its almost never going to have a negligable effect.
Anubis said:Where do you draw the line?
At all non-permanent effects and magic items as I specified.
Anubis said:What happens when a bull's strength spell is cast on the character? Does he suddenly rise up in his EL? NO. Duh. The actual levels take ALL of this into account to begin with, which is why you gain no XP for summoned creatures as well.
Did you miss the sidebar pointed out in the document I gave you!? All this is already explained I fail to see where your confusion stems from!?

Anubis said:What about permanent magical items such as a belt of giant strength?
Personally I wouldn't count them. Simply because they are part of your wealth allowance.
Anubis said:Basically, you're "double-taxing" this stuff. Level accounts for wealth which accounts for the magical items, and level and race account for ability scores.
No I'm not double taxing stuff - you are!
Anubis said:I do think that "above the norm" ability scores for other various races (such as Str+10 for the ogre) should be taken into account, but ONLY when determining ECL for purposes of character level.
Ability Scores are pertinent.
IT WAS YOU WHO INITIALLY POINTED THIS OUT TO ME!

Anubis said:Also, XP should NOT be gained by EL, but by each creature's individual CR, otherwise you're screwing PCs out of XP.
Actually the total opposite is true. If you assign EXP by CR, THEN you are screwing them out of EXP.
eg. Are you trying to say 109th-level characters should gain no EXP from defeating 100th-level opponents even though we know the difference in power is negligable!?
Anubis said:EL works for matched encounters because the XP is the same anyway, but for mixed, it does not work at all. Take your example in that PDF with the pit fiends, gelugons, and dragon. The example puts it at EL 24. For a PEL 20, that nets 24000 XP. If, however, you do it the RIGHT way and determine XP per monster, the XP award is actually 31000. That 7000 can make a huge difference, ya' know. Or is your purpose actually to prevent effective level gaining as per the rules?
The Core Rules don't give anywhere near an accurate outline of mixed opponents.
Anubis said:Methinks you should rethink some of this stuff.
I appreciate your help mate - though I think I have everything under control.
Keep trying to break the system though; its always possible I have missed something.
Anubis said:As it stands, I'm not sure how to incorporate the good parts of your system (the ELs over 20 and other such things) without using the parts that are obviously flawed as much as the core rules. Perhaps you could enlighten me on these.
Judging by your above arguments - its all good.
Anubis said:(On a side note, ECL can be determined by your current tables and done as a simple permanent modifier to character, so problem solved there. But that still makes a big problem with normal races.)
What problem with normal races?