Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cheiromancer" data-source="post: 3044949" data-attributes="member: 141">Hey Krusty!Yeah, Sepulchrave is mostly concerned with the 20 to 40 range.  Which on your scale of thinking is almost as limiting as having campaigns run from 2nd level to 4th. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />  Most of his numbers are coming out a fair bit smaller than the ELH.  I suspect "Spell Level = 6 + (Spellcraft Prerequisite divided by 6...and rounded down)" will end up being the correct formula.  He's being a bit restrictive as to what he's willing to allow, but I'm trying to get him to cut loose.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Ain't that the truth; the ELH is a shambles.  I think that, insofar as Sep and I are making progress, it is because we are implementing those rules according to the equivalence of +2 skill ranks with +1 spell level.One thing I'm having difficulty with is enlarging effects greatly- how do you turn a duration of rounds into a duration of hours, or a 20 foot radius effect into a 2000 foot radius effect?  Surely not by piling on 600 iterations of the extend feat, or 99 iterations of the enlarge feat.  Anyway, thanks for posting.  I know you are a very busy man!</blockquote>

Verification