Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 3048005" data-attributes="member: 326">Hey Kerrick matey! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />&nbsp;The latter.And will you be able to put epic spells into artifacts? That's one of my many gripes about the &quot;epic&quot; spell system - you can't put them into magic items or artifacts. WTF?Of course. But if there is a cost the caster will have to meet it.&nbsp;The metamagic system balances perfectly scaled as it is. I HATE Improved Metamagic. I strongly advise against using something like this.Glad I could help. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Sounds plausible...although it would be +6 levels. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />10 + spell level x2Spellcasters are not meant to move galaxies unless they are eternals or sidereals of magic. By my understanding of logistics, 33rd-level should be the highest level character on a planet, 66th-level should be the highest in the galaxy and 99th the highest in the universe. Thats for characters with a lifepan of a century.I'm contemplating which is best...I don't like the idea that it would cost you gold, but it should cost you something.Don't think for a moment that the lose frame work of spell effects by level is any sort of iron clad bible on the matter. Its just me thinking out loud.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Upper_Krust, post: 3048005, member: 326"] Hey Kerrick matey! :D The latter. And will you be able to put epic spells into artifacts? That's one of my many gripes about the "epic" spell system - you can't put them into magic items or artifacts. WTF? Of course. But if there is a cost the caster will have to meet it. The metamagic system balances perfectly scaled as it is. I HATE Improved Metamagic. I strongly advise against using something like this. Glad I could help. :) Sounds plausible...although it would be +6 levels. ;) 10 + spell level x2 Spellcasters are not meant to move galaxies unless they are eternals or sidereals of magic. By my understanding of logistics, 33rd-level should be the highest level character on a planet, 66th-level should be the highest in the galaxy and 99th the highest in the universe. Thats for characters with a lifepan of a century. I'm contemplating which is best...I don't like the idea that it would cost you gold, but it should cost you something. Don't think for a moment that the lose frame work of spell effects by level is any sort of iron clad bible on the matter. Its just me thinking out loud. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification