Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Inappropriate breasts on female monsters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6395126" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>Yes, because this same argument isn't trotted out time and time again on pretty much any topic that the poster doesn't like about an edition. I'm not specifically accusing you of this Bill91, but, it's certainly a common tactic. I don't like edition X because edition X is so unrealistic - look, they put boobs on dragon people!!</p><p></p><p>I'd buy the argument a lot more if people were a tad more consistent in what they find objectionable. Like was said before there are fifteen other things that don't make a whole lot of sense when it comes to dragon born, but, hey, here's a low hanging fruit target, so, let's jump on. I mean, Draconians, all the way back to 1e, are drawn with tails. Why is that never, ever an issue with the "It's so unrealistic" crowd? In thirty years I've never once heard someone bitch about the fact that lizard folk (or lizard MEN if we want to get right down to it) have tails.</p><p></p><p>I'd buy the argument, "I don't like dragonboobs because I think they look stupid". That's just a personal opinion and that's fine. But, "I don't like dragonboobs because reptiles can't have boobs, it's unrealistic and spoils my suspension of disbelief" doesn't really pass the sniff test.</p><p></p><p>As far as blowing it, see below:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But, the reason has already been answered. The market research they did told them that adding boobs to dragon born was better received by the audience. THAT'S why they did it. They actually took the time to research this and their research told them that boobs was the way to go. So, no, leaving them off would not make sense given that you spent money to find out which version people like better.</p><p></p><p>What they didn't know was that things like this would become rallying flags for edition warring and blown WAY out of proportion to the point where we're still seeing people bitch about it two years after the game has stopped being published.</p><p></p><p>I mean, has anyone seen a 5e pic of a dragon born with boobs? I don't have the books, so, I'm honestly asking here. Did you folks bitch long and loud enough and won? If so, then why are you continuing to flog the dead equine?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 6395126, member: 22779"] Yes, because this same argument isn't trotted out time and time again on pretty much any topic that the poster doesn't like about an edition. I'm not specifically accusing you of this Bill91, but, it's certainly a common tactic. I don't like edition X because edition X is so unrealistic - look, they put boobs on dragon people!! I'd buy the argument a lot more if people were a tad more consistent in what they find objectionable. Like was said before there are fifteen other things that don't make a whole lot of sense when it comes to dragon born, but, hey, here's a low hanging fruit target, so, let's jump on. I mean, Draconians, all the way back to 1e, are drawn with tails. Why is that never, ever an issue with the "It's so unrealistic" crowd? In thirty years I've never once heard someone bitch about the fact that lizard folk (or lizard MEN if we want to get right down to it) have tails. I'd buy the argument, "I don't like dragonboobs because I think they look stupid". That's just a personal opinion and that's fine. But, "I don't like dragonboobs because reptiles can't have boobs, it's unrealistic and spoils my suspension of disbelief" doesn't really pass the sniff test. As far as blowing it, see below: But, the reason has already been answered. The market research they did told them that adding boobs to dragon born was better received by the audience. THAT'S why they did it. They actually took the time to research this and their research told them that boobs was the way to go. So, no, leaving them off would not make sense given that you spent money to find out which version people like better. What they didn't know was that things like this would become rallying flags for edition warring and blown WAY out of proportion to the point where we're still seeing people bitch about it two years after the game has stopped being published. I mean, has anyone seen a 5e pic of a dragon born with boobs? I don't have the books, so, I'm honestly asking here. Did you folks bitch long and loud enough and won? If so, then why are you continuing to flog the dead equine? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Inappropriate breasts on female monsters
Top