Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Inappropriate breasts on female monsters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elf Witch" data-source="post: 6395780" data-attributes="member: 9037"><p>Please tell me where I took it to if you like dragonboobs you are wrong? I stated my reasons for not liking them again for emphasis <em>my opinion</em>I prefer dragons and their kinds to be more reptile less mammals because to me that is more interesting and as such I would want them to be like most of Earth's reptiles. hence why I used the science example for my version of them. I never said it was the only valid version. Again it is more believable to me but again that is <em>my opinion</em> and I have stated over and over in many posts that I make here on Enworld that opinions are not facts.</p><p></p><p>I didn't break out the sexist argument at all others did. But I will say this if the only reason you are putting boobs on a monster is to make them sexy for male gamers then that is sexist. but I don't think that is why WOTC did it. I also get that there are female players who want a more human female form on a PC class and that is a valid thing. I know female players who make a point of saying there female dwarves don't have beards. I also know who say they do. Neither is wrong it just a preference. </p><p></p><p>There is no way you can take from anything I ave said that one preference is right and one is wrong. Unless you are deliberately being obtuse for some agenda of your own.</p><p></p><p>You know what I find interesting is that it is perfectly okay to sling things at 3E like wizards and muggles or BMX biker and angel summoner and that is not edition warring but god forbid someone says I don't enjoy 4E because it did not deliver the kind of play style I enjoy. Nor is it edition warring to not like how a 4E class or race is done. My dislike of how WOTC does dragonborn has nothing to do with my not liking 4E. Yes I freely admit I kind of wish tieflings and dragonborn were not core classes. But I totally get why they are included. It is no big deal to me because at my home table I can do as I want. if asked yes I will say what my preference is but I am not going to nerdrage over it. </p><p></p><p>Dire bare I never said it dragonboobs were bad science read what I said above.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elf Witch, post: 6395780, member: 9037"] Please tell me where I took it to if you like dragonboobs you are wrong? I stated my reasons for not liking them again for emphasis [I]my opinion[/I]I prefer dragons and their kinds to be more reptile less mammals because to me that is more interesting and as such I would want them to be like most of Earth's reptiles. hence why I used the science example for my version of them. I never said it was the only valid version. Again it is more believable to me but again that is [I]my opinion[/I] and I have stated over and over in many posts that I make here on Enworld that opinions are not facts. I didn't break out the sexist argument at all others did. But I will say this if the only reason you are putting boobs on a monster is to make them sexy for male gamers then that is sexist. but I don't think that is why WOTC did it. I also get that there are female players who want a more human female form on a PC class and that is a valid thing. I know female players who make a point of saying there female dwarves don't have beards. I also know who say they do. Neither is wrong it just a preference. There is no way you can take from anything I ave said that one preference is right and one is wrong. Unless you are deliberately being obtuse for some agenda of your own. You know what I find interesting is that it is perfectly okay to sling things at 3E like wizards and muggles or BMX biker and angel summoner and that is not edition warring but god forbid someone says I don't enjoy 4E because it did not deliver the kind of play style I enjoy. Nor is it edition warring to not like how a 4E class or race is done. My dislike of how WOTC does dragonborn has nothing to do with my not liking 4E. Yes I freely admit I kind of wish tieflings and dragonborn were not core classes. But I totally get why they are included. It is no big deal to me because at my home table I can do as I want. if asked yes I will say what my preference is but I am not going to nerdrage over it. Dire bare I never said it dragonboobs were bad science read what I said above. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Inappropriate breasts on female monsters
Top