Man in the Funny Hat said:
Bear with me a minute here...
Uh. Okay. I'm not sure how running Linux at home makes them a more knowledgable tech about dealing with Windows.
By "be wary" I wasn't intending to imply they are a bad tech, just that they need further investigation. i was a bit more explicit with this in later comments. If a tech runs Linux at home, you can be fairly assured that they know what they are doing on Windows exactly BECAUSE of the ubiquity of it. Anyone who learns Linux picks up Windows along the way.
Having technical knowledge and being a gaming enthusiast are not mutually exclusive.
That's also not what I said. Just that gaming enthusiasts very often are tech savvy but make decisions for your machine as if it were a gaming rig. It's their background. And lets face it there are way more gaming enthusiasts who can tell you exactly how to tweak out the last bit of performance out of your system than there are techs who can actually help you as a common user (if you are not a common user, you wouldn't be taking you computer in).
Okay, if they tell you to get anti-malware yourself they might be okay, but if they offer to do it for you at a charge they're suspect? While it may be that's not what you came for it's what you're ASKING about at the moment, no? Just to rephrase: If I say, "I'm having trouble with spyware," and he responds with, "Stop using IE and downloading all that crap... anything else I can help you with?" then he's my new rabbi, but offering to simply apply the fix for a fee when you've just stated that your problem is malware, that's bad. Got it.
What I am saying is if you are there to get your sound card upgraded and mention a spyware problem, the tech should educate you instead of ask you for money. It takes approximately 20 seconds while you are opening their box to tell them "You may want to try out anti-malware software from Macafee or Symantec. There are also plenty of free packages available on the internet such as AdAware. If you need help with any of those, we can set them up for you." If they respond with "What you need is Norton System Works which we have right here. I can install it while I'm looking at your machine for $60," then they are a saleperson, not a tech. And you can find much better tech support, hence the suggestion to leave and find someone else.
Ah, and failure to know anything about Linux makes them suspect for other purposes as well. Got it.
See, right there you have proven you are not technically proficient with computers. The question, of course, has nothing to do with Linux. There are many reasons for boot failures that can occur before the OS is even looked at. If the "tech" doesn't know this, then they are incompetent. This is a very effective question to ask about to determine if the person behind the counter has even half a clue as to how to perform their job.
Seriously, if you go to a tech and say, "My computer has problems - could it be malware?" and all he does is offer to install anti-malware and run it for you then you STILL have to know enough to know that you DON'T know if that will fix your problem even if he says it will. Techs are going to come at all levels of competence (or incompetence), just as users will, but, "Be wary if he doesn't use Linux or Mac OS X at home?" That is elitist garbage.
Like I said, you are misinterpreting my "be wary" comment. That's my fault, though, I really wasn't clear.
Perhaps the best way to find a good tech is to simply know enough about your computer to know if the person you're talking to knows LESS about computers than you do; ask for recommendations from people you know who have had to seek technical help; expect to pay for software and services that you can't provide for yourself; judge his worth by his ability to address your problems and concerns swiftly, courteously, and reliably, and be willing to play what he's worth to you.
Well all this is true, of course. It applies to any kind of professional service industry, I would think. What I was relating was little tests for those who do NOT know enough to know if THEY know.
Also, the post was supposed to be cheeky - I think you took it way to seriously. I figured the thread would attract people like me who have worked as techs and can find the humor in the statements.