MarauderX
Explorer
DreamChaser said:Dishonorable and evil are very different things.
Plus, "honor" defined beyond keeping one's word has to do with a bunch of rules of chivalry which generally do nothing but get more people killed.
And paladins are what? Suicidal idiots?
One thing I like about the 3.x rogue is that it is NOT inherently a thief or assassin but it can be.
DC
I guess I just disagree with you here. It's a class that is geared for everything dealing with traps, hiding, thievery, etc., just look at the class skills. It wouldn't take a leap of imagination to equate a shadow-hugging backstabber as evil.
I know that in many ways you are correct, that it doesn't HAVE to fit, but how many thieve's guilds are out to donate their cash to charity? It plays to the quality of greed, not commonly a trait of good.
[steering thread back on track]I like the assassin though... looks good. The backstab is a little powerful IMO, considering all of the other feats the class can choose from. It pretty much takes the place of the Assassin PrC along with some bonuses that makes the PrC look weak. The choice of feats is great though, and would help with creating a larger diversity of assassins than there are monks in the monk class. There are a few things I would take out to even it up to the other core classes, but other than that I like the development. [/steering thread back on track]