Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 6270704">130 is better than 150 but i wouldnt pay that for pathfinder (I just see very little point buying pathfinder when i still have the 3E and 3.5 books and not into the whole adventure path thing). I am not freaking out, i said they probably set it at fifty for a good reason. People are just being careful what they spend on things (keeo in mind many of us have other games we'd like to buy as well this year). Money is important, and the economy has been shaky. It is just a bit steep when you consider there is the need to buy two additional books and in the past wotc managed to keep its cover prices lower than others because they do big print runs and do not do pod. I figured it might go as high as forty. For a single core book, i would pay 50. But to buy three books at that price, when I found the previous edition to be such a dissapointment, is harder for me to justify. And like i said, i have to consider my household, not just myself. If i was single, i wouldn't think about it. But a purchase of over 100 dollars means we both need to evaluate the purchase (if she spent 150 bucks on a game, i'd be concerned). I think the problem here is, i really cant promise it will get the years of use I got from 2E or 3E because I am waiting to see if the new edition is one i like. I might just play it for a few months before deciding if the books are worth the cost.And like i said, didnt mind spending fifty on numenera because the core book was enough to run the game and i expected a price in that range since it looked like a smaller operation than wotc. This price just caught me off guard.</blockquote>

Verification