Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Initiative house rule.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EvanNave55" data-source="post: 7047658" data-attributes="member: 6789374"><p>I've been thinking of adding a house rule to the game which gives initiative a bit more oomph while still keeping it fairly simple.</p><p></p><p>Essentially initiative would now be a track from 1-20 with particularly high or low scores 'rolling over' for example if someone's invested some resources into there initiative and roll really well such that they would get a 27 they essentially get a bonus round of actions for reacting so fast and afterwards act on initiative count 7</p><p></p><p>Or conversely if someone rolls poorly and has a penalty to initiative such that they'd get a -2 they would instead act on initiative count 18 on the next round.</p><p></p><p>All this really does is give particularly high initiative scores a bonus round over particularly low scores. If you rolled above a 7 then you get the same effective number of rounds as the initiative 27 guy it's only if one person rolled really high and another low it would make any sort of difference.</p><p></p><p>So yeah this would reward/penalize this who spend resources on/ignore initiative. What do you think?</p><p></p><p>Sent from my XT1080 using <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EvanNave55, post: 7047658, member: 6789374"] I've been thinking of adding a house rule to the game which gives initiative a bit more oomph while still keeping it fairly simple. Essentially initiative would now be a track from 1-20 with particularly high or low scores 'rolling over' for example if someone's invested some resources into there initiative and roll really well such that they would get a 27 they essentially get a bonus round of actions for reacting so fast and afterwards act on initiative count 7 Or conversely if someone rolls poorly and has a penalty to initiative such that they'd get a -2 they would instead act on initiative count 18 on the next round. All this really does is give particularly high initiative scores a bonus round over particularly low scores. If you rolled above a 7 then you get the same effective number of rounds as the initiative 27 guy it's only if one person rolled really high and another low it would make any sort of difference. So yeah this would reward/penalize this who spend resources on/ignore initiative. What do you think? Sent from my XT1080 using [URL=http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205]EN World mobile app[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Initiative house rule.
Top