Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Interview with D&D VP Jess Lanzillo on Comicbook.com
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 9433845" data-attributes="member: 20323"><p>[USER=54840]@SlyFlourish[/USER]</p><p></p><p>I was able to thread together my first clear connection that WotC/Hasbro's push toward digitalization IS indeed influencing the design of the 2024 TTRPG. At least this is the clearest connection I've heard about.</p><p></p><p>First, a strong caveat: This could turn out to be false, if the Unearthed Arcana version of <em>Produce Flame </em>did not make it into the 2024 PHB. So I'll need to rely on someone else to check that (I don't have early access nor will I be getting the book). Ok...</p><p></p><p>This is thanks to 2 sources:</p><p></p><p>First, July 26, 2024 in the thread <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/wotc-removes-digital-content-team-credits-from-d-d-beyond.705711/" target="_blank">WotC Removes Digital Content Team Credits From D&D Beyond</a>, ENWorld reported on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/faithelilley/posts/pfbid02JaKvJYFmfbvbqfU5QH2HQFdbwGshdqBQ5xbhPPgorqBdvMYTQ4L9vERDwpubkqfBl?__cft__[0]=AZWUHO6M7doPZwb1RJfD8mVhr4uuARFNKuvwap1vmfpl3nsnWOWCg72PE-48KPml4JlhH0eFYpHzdQ4hN9tj-lQKwCo8xkYrSxJAQS-0K3cdYrg8A16J8mvXz7ms8CPHhe4sMqv4zzYnSLCRUjOPR45jlX5zlYZ-hD2lvtUK-Gz-rO96Tnc8MTew4rFAAav-Cegw06woXf-983wRXjAJiXZy&[B]tn[/B]=%2CO%2CP-R" target="_blank">Faith Elisabeth Lilley</a>, Senior Producer on WotC's digital content team, who said: <em><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)">"The lead designers would send over the rules for each new rulebook and we'd go through it, give feedback, highlight potential balance issues, </span></em><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)"><em><u>look at new rules/design that was difficult to implement digitally and suggest tweaks to improve</u></em></span><em><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)"><strong> it</strong> etc etc. We even had ideas for new content that was then included in the book."</span></em></p><p></p><p>At the time, most of us took that in stride and assumed she was talking mainly about adapting the game system within a video game, sort of like how Larian made certain adaptations. However...</p><p></p><p>Second, Aug 9, 2024 in a video entitled <a href="https://youtu.be/ZvNBp1aJL2A?t=3199" target="_blank">D&D 5.5e (2024) disregards DMs, martial/caster divide; WOTC job posting for making AI DMs at the 55:29 mark</a><strong>,</strong> Ronald The Rules Lawyer refers to a clip of Jeremy Crawford discussing 2024 changes to the <em>Produce Flame </em>cantrip that were inspired by BG3... Jeremy Crawford says: <em><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)">"We've also made it so that some spells that were really painful to cast in terms of their action economy are far less painful. I think one of the prime examples of that is Produce Flame... That cantrip was really painful to set up. Once you got it going, it was fun to hurl the fire. Now it's way easier to cast it. And that is funnily enough another one where it was not only painful to cast in the tabletop game, but when I was playing BG3 it was actually excruciating to cast..."</span></em></p><p></p><p>Ronald points out that <a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/2217-produce-flame" target="_blank">2014 <em>Produce Flame</em></a> can be hurled offensively as part of the action used to cast the spell – so there's no action economy issue, it's a dual use thing. Jeremy Crawford is actually referring to something unique to BG3 where the user interface pop-ups every time you cast <em>Produce Flame</em> – do you want to cast it as a light? or do you want to hurl it?</p><p></p><p>I think this is exclusively a digitalization issue. There's no issue with 2014 <em>Produce Flame</em> for the TTRPG.</p><p></p><p>The solution – at least in the <a href="https://media.dndbeyond.com/compendium-images/ua/bastions-cantrips/BRF3GSu0nTfNu8p4/UA2023-BastionsCantrips.pdf" target="_blank">"Bastions and Cantrips" Unearthed Arcana (Oct 5, 2023)</a> – was to make casting <em>Produce Flame</em> (as a light source) a Bonus Action, and then you need to use the Magic Action to hurl it offensively. So now in the 2024 TTRPG, a player needs to use <em>both </em>their Action <em>and </em>their Bonus Action to hurl <em>Produce Flame</em> on the first round. And it creates some weirdness in corner cases where a player might want to hurl flame offensively and extinguish their light source in the process.</p><p></p><p>It's relatively minor, but it does make <em>Produce Flame</em> worse as an attack cantrip in the TTRPG in order to make its user interface easier to implement in video games / digital game environments. So, the new version being proposed is actually the opposite of what Jeremy Crawford is saying – it's <em>more</em> painful on the action economy in the TTRPG, not less.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]376447[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]ZvNBp1aJL2A:3333[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quickleaf, post: 9433845, member: 20323"] [USER=54840]@SlyFlourish[/USER] I was able to thread together my first clear connection that WotC/Hasbro's push toward digitalization IS indeed influencing the design of the 2024 TTRPG. At least this is the clearest connection I've heard about. First, a strong caveat: This could turn out to be false, if the Unearthed Arcana version of [I]Produce Flame [/I]did not make it into the 2024 PHB. So I'll need to rely on someone else to check that (I don't have early access nor will I be getting the book). Ok... This is thanks to 2 sources: First, July 26, 2024 in the thread [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/wotc-removes-digital-content-team-credits-from-d-d-beyond.705711/']WotC Removes Digital Content Team Credits From D&D Beyond[/URL], ENWorld reported on [URL='https://www.facebook.com/faithelilley/posts/pfbid02JaKvJYFmfbvbqfU5QH2HQFdbwGshdqBQ5xbhPPgorqBdvMYTQ4L9vERDwpubkqfBl?__cft__[0]=AZWUHO6M7doPZwb1RJfD8mVhr4uuARFNKuvwap1vmfpl3nsnWOWCg72PE-48KPml4JlhH0eFYpHzdQ4hN9tj-lQKwCo8xkYrSxJAQS-0K3cdYrg8A16J8mvXz7ms8CPHhe4sMqv4zzYnSLCRUjOPR45jlX5zlYZ-hD2lvtUK-Gz-rO96Tnc8MTew4rFAAav-Cegw06woXf-983wRXjAJiXZy&[B]tn[/B]=%2CO%2CP-R']Faith Elisabeth Lilley[/URL], Senior Producer on WotC's digital content team, who said: [I][COLOR=rgb(251, 160, 38)]"The lead designers would send over the rules for each new rulebook and we'd go through it, give feedback, highlight potential balance issues, [/COLOR][/I][COLOR=rgb(251, 160, 38)][I][U]look at new rules/design that was difficult to implement digitally and suggest tweaks to improve[/U][/I][/COLOR][I][COLOR=rgb(251, 160, 38)][B] it[/B] etc etc. We even had ideas for new content that was then included in the book."[/COLOR][/I] At the time, most of us took that in stride and assumed she was talking mainly about adapting the game system within a video game, sort of like how Larian made certain adaptations. However... Second, Aug 9, 2024 in a video entitled [URL='https://youtu.be/ZvNBp1aJL2A?t=3199']D&D 5.5e (2024) disregards DMs, martial/caster divide; WOTC job posting for making AI DMs at the 55:29 mark[/URL][B],[/B] Ronald The Rules Lawyer refers to a clip of Jeremy Crawford discussing 2024 changes to the [I]Produce Flame [/I]cantrip that were inspired by BG3... Jeremy Crawford says: [I][COLOR=rgb(251, 160, 38)]"We've also made it so that some spells that were really painful to cast in terms of their action economy are far less painful. I think one of the prime examples of that is Produce Flame... That cantrip was really painful to set up. Once you got it going, it was fun to hurl the fire. Now it's way easier to cast it. And that is funnily enough another one where it was not only painful to cast in the tabletop game, but when I was playing BG3 it was actually excruciating to cast..."[/COLOR][/I] Ronald points out that [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/2217-produce-flame']2014 [I]Produce Flame[/I][/URL] can be hurled offensively as part of the action used to cast the spell – so there's no action economy issue, it's a dual use thing. Jeremy Crawford is actually referring to something unique to BG3 where the user interface pop-ups every time you cast [I]Produce Flame[/I] – do you want to cast it as a light? or do you want to hurl it? I think this is exclusively a digitalization issue. There's no issue with 2014 [I]Produce Flame[/I] for the TTRPG. The solution – at least in the [URL='https://media.dndbeyond.com/compendium-images/ua/bastions-cantrips/BRF3GSu0nTfNu8p4/UA2023-BastionsCantrips.pdf']"Bastions and Cantrips" Unearthed Arcana (Oct 5, 2023)[/URL] – was to make casting [I]Produce Flame[/I] (as a light source) a Bonus Action, and then you need to use the Magic Action to hurl it offensively. So now in the 2024 TTRPG, a player needs to use [I]both [/I]their Action [I]and [/I]their Bonus Action to hurl [I]Produce Flame[/I] on the first round. And it creates some weirdness in corner cases where a player might want to hurl flame offensively and extinguish their light source in the process. It's relatively minor, but it does make [I]Produce Flame[/I] worse as an attack cantrip in the TTRPG in order to make its user interface easier to implement in video games / digital game environments. So, the new version being proposed is actually the opposite of what Jeremy Crawford is saying – it's [I]more[/I] painful on the action economy in the TTRPG, not less. [ATTACH type="full" alt="Screen Shot 2024-08-12 at 9.05.26 PM.png"]376447[/ATTACH] [MEDIA=youtube]ZvNBp1aJL2A:3333[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Interview with D&D VP Jess Lanzillo on Comicbook.com
Top