Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Invincible PC's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 4982440" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>No, because this very assumption that you WILL win invalidates the rest of your logic. You won't always win. In any realistic sense offense is primary over defense. Only the very most simplistic case of an "offense bonus" and a "defense bonus" which are exactly symmetrical and where N damage taken by you is as good as N damage delivered yields the result that defense and offense are equally good. 4e violates these conditions at every single turn.</p><p></p><p>There is a more subtle reason why offense trumps defense as well, which is the general tactical argument. A high offense force can deploy itself more easily to greater advantage, take better advantage of mobility, probably gains more advantage from terrain, etc. </p><p></p><p>In practically every sense defense is inferior to offense both as a general tactical principle and specifically in the context of 4e combat. </p><p></p><p>Now, that doesn't mean it can't be even more advantageous to have the tactical flexibility of say having one very high defense unit and a number of high offense units to back it up. However this will depend on the mix of tactical situations you face and the skill of the opposing commanders, as well as factors like how spread out the units are relative to their effective engagement ranges, etc. </p><p></p><p>SOD-like, or even just the common generally degrading 4e conditions, effects also militate more towards offense. You want to DEPLOY these effects and disable the enemy quickly vs hoping to resist his employment of them. Again this mostly devolves down to tactical advantage. When you get yourself into a good position you want to strike a decisive blow, not nibble a bit on the other guy and then let him react. His first mistake should be his last mistake.</p><p></p><p>In any case my point stands. Defense is significantly less valuable than offense and in 4e offensive boosts are actually cheaper than defensive ones. Its no wonder that in general by epic tier most characters are doing crushing amounts of damage and hitting on low numbers yet their opponents hit them in return on equally low numbers, usually. There isn't exact symmetry between PCs and monsters of course, but close enough to draw reasonable conclusions which I've validated pretty well in actual play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 4982440, member: 82106"] No, because this very assumption that you WILL win invalidates the rest of your logic. You won't always win. In any realistic sense offense is primary over defense. Only the very most simplistic case of an "offense bonus" and a "defense bonus" which are exactly symmetrical and where N damage taken by you is as good as N damage delivered yields the result that defense and offense are equally good. 4e violates these conditions at every single turn. There is a more subtle reason why offense trumps defense as well, which is the general tactical argument. A high offense force can deploy itself more easily to greater advantage, take better advantage of mobility, probably gains more advantage from terrain, etc. In practically every sense defense is inferior to offense both as a general tactical principle and specifically in the context of 4e combat. Now, that doesn't mean it can't be even more advantageous to have the tactical flexibility of say having one very high defense unit and a number of high offense units to back it up. However this will depend on the mix of tactical situations you face and the skill of the opposing commanders, as well as factors like how spread out the units are relative to their effective engagement ranges, etc. SOD-like, or even just the common generally degrading 4e conditions, effects also militate more towards offense. You want to DEPLOY these effects and disable the enemy quickly vs hoping to resist his employment of them. Again this mostly devolves down to tactical advantage. When you get yourself into a good position you want to strike a decisive blow, not nibble a bit on the other guy and then let him react. His first mistake should be his last mistake. In any case my point stands. Defense is significantly less valuable than offense and in 4e offensive boosts are actually cheaper than defensive ones. Its no wonder that in general by epic tier most characters are doing crushing amounts of damage and hitting on low numbers yet their opponents hit them in return on equally low numbers, usually. There isn't exact symmetry between PCs and monsters of course, but close enough to draw reasonable conclusions which I've validated pretty well in actual play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Invincible PC's
Top