Michael, that was a great post. Seems to follow a very logical process.Michael R. Proteau said:It would be fun if they used little post credit snippets like the introduction of Fury to keep tying these together and building towards Avengers.
Michael, that was a great post. Seems to follow a very logical process.Michael R. Proteau said:It would be fun if they used little post credit snippets like the introduction of Fury to keep tying these together and building towards Avengers.
Say what you want, but Marvel Zombies vs. Army of Darkness was absolutely awesome.Felon said:As I recall, the seemingly neverending Marvel Zombies nonsense got started in Ultimate Fantastic Four. I regard that series as the "Lobo" of this decade: the equivalent of a baby-in-a-microwave joke that is maybe cute and shocking the first time you heard it, but not the tenth or twentieth time.
I'm iffy on that one...kind of looks like a stretch, but who knows.Fast Learner said:So, it appears that Tony was working on Cap's shield.
Fallen Seraph said:You know all this villain talk has got me wondering. How well would a traditional superhero (thus excluding The Watchmen) film do without a "main villain"?
Amellia said:To the rumors of McConaughey and Pitt as Cap and Thor, Marvel hasn't given any official word on that yet, but my opinion is that McConaughey might be able to do it -- Captain America's got that well-known all-American thing going for him, and having a known actor in the role could actually sort of work, where it wouldn't have with Spidey or Batman as well. Brad Pitt as Thor, in my opinion, is just ridiculous. I really doubt Marvel would go with that.
I really really hope they don't cast McConaughey as Cap. It would be a horrible casting decision. Cap is more about presence than looks. He inpsires and is able to lead people into battle to put it all on the line to do the right thing. McConaghly image is a spineless slacker whiner in most of his roles and I just don't see him as having the charisma or screen presence to make it believable that power houses and strong personalities like Fury, Iron Man and Thor would follow him to the bathroom let alone into battle.
Well, some of the best Batman stories didn't have a sueprvillain. Get past Joker and maybe Ras Al Ghul, the good villains start dwindling away quickly.Fallen Seraph said:You know all this villain talk has got me wondering. How well would a traditional superhero (thus excluding The Watchmen) film do without a "main villain"?
Could it rake in the bucks with simply the interplay between the superhero and the world, or does there need to be that main antagonist?
I state this to considering with Iron Man, while there is conflict there, the main "villain" in the form of Iron Monger didn't add much it was simply in my eyes a combat set-piece and could have been gone from the movie without harming it.
Ankh-Morpork Guard said:Same with Brad Pitt as Thor.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.