Irontooth...owie!!!!!

[Nail]

I assume that the d10 extra he gets when bloodied is also maxed when critical hit is rolled?

I don't think so....only weapon damage is max-ed.

 

[FreeXenon]

Here too. We drew aggro on Irontooth and the rest of the second encounter area before finishing off the entrance. It hurt a lot. Fun deaths all around and a valuable lesson learned.

 

[Rechan]

I dislike how Irontooth also has Shifty. That's not fair; that's a Kobold ability.

 

[Starbuck_II]

I dislike how Irontooth also has Shifty. That's not fair; that's a Kobold ability.

Maybe he was raised by Kobolds.

 

[Dracollich]

I dislike how Irontooth also has Shifty. That's not fair; that's a Kobold ability.

Seems he has Goblin tactics (shift on a miss) not the shifty ability.

 

[JiffyPopTart]

In my game, as the GM, I decide at the beginning of the round what all the NPCs are going to try to do. Irontooth was going to charge the Paladin.

Over the course of the round the Paladin was dropped by the skirmishers and the minions. Since I play the NPCs to stick to plan, Irontooth ran around the corner and charged into the now-unconscious and dying Paladin.

Beheadings ensued.

Over the course of the rest of the battle the wizard, cleric, and fighter were also knocked out and dying. The rogue ran away.

DS

 

[the Jester]

He killec the paladin when I ran it, but the party spent most all their money to get him raised.

 

[PeelSeel2]

That encounter would have TPK'ed the party if we would have been running the paladins Lay on hands correctly. We used it At-Will; Not At-Will once per day. That was wrong. Even with that mistake, the players walked away from the encounter firm in their belief 4e is much deadlier and nailbite-ier (??) than 3.x.

 

[hennebeck]

Anyone think making it a level 6 encounter was a bad idea?
Too tough.

 

[Nifft]

Anyone think making it a level 6 encounter was a bad idea?
Too tough.

Very much so. Made me feel like a beta-tester for the death & dying rules.

Cheers, -- N