Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="enrious" data-source="post: 5777932" data-attributes="member: 2126">I don't know this thread in isolation maybe not, I'm thinking more of the majority of your posts/threads seem to have a definite bias against WotC, or at least that's my read of them.This thread.The post where you said that WotC operatives were sneakily slandering and slanting summaries.The thread where you raised the thought that WotC lied to people about 5e/4e.A post wherein you said that WotC is likely to be lying about this playtesting and that "the new leaf line might work with people who are pleased with the 4th edition but the Pathfinders will probably stay where they are."A thread discussing possible 5e products, you say, "I don't know what the catalog is going to be. It might not make it beyond year one at this rate."There's a reason for the term, "corpus delicti".I'm not accusing you of having an agenda to smear WotC/5e (for whatever reason), I'm just saying that it looks odd for a brand-new user to jump in and start slinging mud like that.Maybe you're used to other forums, I don't know - but generally ENWorld isn't like that.  We try to be friendly, helpful, but above all respectful - and that isn't reserved for just the people on this board.  We have designers from a variety of games, including D&D from a variety of editions who've been our guests here and even participating members.So when you're attacking them, whether openly or via innuendo, you very well could be attacking fellow ENWorld members. And more to the point, adding a degree of rancor where none should exist.</blockquote>

Verification