Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is anyone going to use the new 2024 backgrounds?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Corinnguard" data-source="post: 9416612" data-attributes="member: 7033886"><p>True. Before <em>Tasha's Cauldron of Everything, </em>races had fixed ASIs that tended to favor only certain classes. A Dragonborn character started the game with a +2 STR and a +1 CHA. This arrangement favored STR-based Fighters, Barbarians, Bards, Sorcerers and Warlocks. It also really favored Paladins who depended on both STR and CHA. But if you wanted to be Dragonborn who wanted to be a Rogue or a Wizard, you were kind of out of luck until you could grab an ASI at 4th level for DEX or INT.</p><p></p><p><em>Tasha's Cauldron of Everything</em> gave everyone the chance to assign the +2/+1 or the +1/+1/+1 ASIs to any ability score they wanted their character to have. Which IMO was an improvement. As ASIs were now another element to customize your character with.</p><p></p><p>And now 2024 D&D has decided to follow in the footsteps of PF2 and Level Up by putting ASIs into Backgrounds instead of the races. However, certain backgrounds do favor certain character classes. Anyone who has followed the Quick Build rules in 5e when designing their characters knows this. You want your character to be a Fighter, the class's Quick Build suggests that you take up the Soldier background. However, you don't have to take up this background for your Fighter if you don't want to. There probably are a number of players who take up the suggested background simply because it saves them the time and effort. But there probably are a number of other players who take up another background just to put in an unexpected twist to their character's backstory. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> The street urchin who became the fighter, or the acolyte who became a fighter, etc. Neither approach is wrong when developing a backstory IMO.</p><p></p><p>PF2 has it where you receive a fixed ASI of +2 from one of two ability scores (such as INT or WIS) and a floating ASI of +2 that you can assign to another ability score of your choice. This is an addition to your ancestral ASIs, your class ASI, and 4 floating ASIs at 1st level. Level Up otoh has it where you received a fixed ASI of +1 for just a single ability score and a floating ASI +1 that you can assign to another ability score of your choice. So, there is some choice here on where you want the ASIs to go when developing your character, just not a lot.</p><p></p><p>The background ASIs for 2024 D&D depend on whether or not you pick the +2/+1 option or the +1/+1/+1 option. But you can only apply these ASIs to three fixed ability scores, and these scores might favor particular classes much like how the fixed racial ASIs in the original 5e PHB did.</p><p></p><p>Since 2024 D&D is backwards compatible with 2014 D&D, it should be interesting to see which version of 5e's backgrounds will be picked up by the players. I'll be continuing with the backgrounds from 2014 D&D because there are no plans for my group to make the switch to 2024 D&D any time soon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Corinnguard, post: 9416612, member: 7033886"] True. Before [I]Tasha's Cauldron of Everything, [/I]races had fixed ASIs that tended to favor only certain classes. A Dragonborn character started the game with a +2 STR and a +1 CHA. This arrangement favored STR-based Fighters, Barbarians, Bards, Sorcerers and Warlocks. It also really favored Paladins who depended on both STR and CHA. But if you wanted to be Dragonborn who wanted to be a Rogue or a Wizard, you were kind of out of luck until you could grab an ASI at 4th level for DEX or INT. [I]Tasha's Cauldron of Everything[/I] gave everyone the chance to assign the +2/+1 or the +1/+1/+1 ASIs to any ability score they wanted their character to have. Which IMO was an improvement. As ASIs were now another element to customize your character with. And now 2024 D&D has decided to follow in the footsteps of PF2 and Level Up by putting ASIs into Backgrounds instead of the races. However, certain backgrounds do favor certain character classes. Anyone who has followed the Quick Build rules in 5e when designing their characters knows this. You want your character to be a Fighter, the class's Quick Build suggests that you take up the Soldier background. However, you don't have to take up this background for your Fighter if you don't want to. There probably are a number of players who take up the suggested background simply because it saves them the time and effort. But there probably are a number of other players who take up another background just to put in an unexpected twist to their character's backstory. ;) The street urchin who became the fighter, or the acolyte who became a fighter, etc. Neither approach is wrong when developing a backstory IMO. PF2 has it where you receive a fixed ASI of +2 from one of two ability scores (such as INT or WIS) and a floating ASI of +2 that you can assign to another ability score of your choice. This is an addition to your ancestral ASIs, your class ASI, and 4 floating ASIs at 1st level. Level Up otoh has it where you received a fixed ASI of +1 for just a single ability score and a floating ASI +1 that you can assign to another ability score of your choice. So, there is some choice here on where you want the ASIs to go when developing your character, just not a lot. The background ASIs for 2024 D&D depend on whether or not you pick the +2/+1 option or the +1/+1/+1 option. But you can only apply these ASIs to three fixed ability scores, and these scores might favor particular classes much like how the fixed racial ASIs in the original 5e PHB did. Since 2024 D&D is backwards compatible with 2014 D&D, it should be interesting to see which version of 5e's backgrounds will be picked up by the players. I'll be continuing with the backgrounds from 2014 D&D because there are no plans for my group to make the switch to 2024 D&D any time soon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is anyone going to use the new 2024 backgrounds?
Top