Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9417183" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>That's certainly ok for your tables.&nbsp; My games tend to last for longer &amp; reach higher levels than average so I think that it is farr too early to give a blanket blessing for anything goes like that.&nbsp; We don't yet know what problematic unintended &amp; disruptive combos will exist in 2024 &amp; we don't know what parts of character creation/advancement they will be assembled from.&nbsp; What we do know though is that skepticism is entirely justified because wotc has recently admitted that they knew &quot;very early on&quot; about something that was too powerful as well as how RAI failed so spectacularly but waited a decade to start talking about or explicitly admit it.&nbsp; If I can't trust wotc to have my back when I notice something they know about seems screwy then I need to proactively take steps to mitigate the risk before it can impact my campaign or session planning</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9417183, member: 93670"] That's certainly ok for your tables. My games tend to last for longer & reach higher levels than average so I think that it is farr too early to give a blanket blessing for anything goes like that. We don't yet know what problematic unintended & disruptive combos will exist in 2024 & we don't know what parts of character creation/advancement they will be assembled from. What we do know though is that skepticism is entirely justified because wotc has recently admitted that they knew "very early on" about something that was too powerful as well as how RAI failed so spectacularly but waited a decade to start talking about or explicitly admit it. If I can't trust wotc to have my back when I notice something they know about seems screwy then I need to proactively take steps to mitigate the risk before it can impact my campaign or session planning [/QUOTE]

Verification