Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 9417215" data-attributes="member: 2525">1) They didn't boost it. They are going through each section of the PHB, and did that section. They didn't even do it early, though it comes early in the book, indicating it was sort of left over in terms of topics to cover that they finally got around to;2) They didn't cover it as big, important, or highly creative. I know that's your interpretation but I don't see any verbiage in their coverage that supports that claim. What specifically did they say that made you think it was being presented as such?That's their job, right, to sell the content they produce. Why are you objecting to them selling what they make?But you've given that review 6 times now, on the same message board. Why are you re-selling that message over and over again here, when it doesn't even seem to apply very well to this topic, and is surely a point you've already made to this audience?Do you think your peers here, who are likely the most informed D&amp;D players around, are stupid and cannot judge for themselves based on the same data you have whether this is useful content for their games or not?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 9417215, member: 2525"] 1) They didn't boost it. They are going through each section of the PHB, and did that section. They didn't even do it early, though it comes early in the book, indicating it was sort of left over in terms of topics to cover that they finally got around to; 2) They didn't cover it as big, important, or highly creative. I know that's your interpretation but I don't see any verbiage in their coverage that supports that claim. What specifically did they say that made you think it was being presented as such? That's their job, right, to sell the content they produce. Why are you objecting to them selling what they make? But you've given that review 6 times now, on the same message board. Why are you re-selling that message over and over again here, when it doesn't even seem to apply very well to this topic, and is surely a point you've already made to this audience? Do you think your peers here, who are likely the most informed D&D players around, are stupid and cannot judge for themselves based on the same data you have whether this is useful content for their games or not? [/QUOTE]

Verification