Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Cause Fear still a 1st level spell in 2024?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 9443231" data-attributes="member: 6750235"><p>There is no save to make. It's that check after taking that action. If people in the campaign are spending actions constantly investigating everything as they travel they're going to travel rather slowly, lol. </p><p></p><p>We need to ask ourselves why and how someone might investigate from a distance, or how they interact. Hallucinatory terrain isn't anything more than another terrain feature for characters to see until after they take that action when there's no reason to take that action in the first place.</p><p></p><p>It's also a large area, long duration, and unlike most illusions doesn't require concentration.</p><p></p><p>Most people go around that stuff if they can to avoid it. I have yet to see a fighter find a tar pit and say "I gotta get me into some of that" instead of going safely around it.</p><p></p><p>A bog that replicates the smell of rotten eggs would register as poisonous and potentially dangerous to someone familiar with the concept. </p><p></p><p>The DM should be describing the illusion as if it's real within the senses of the players. So if there's a smell that's dangerous because toxic fumes exist within gassy swamps then the DM might call for a survival check regarding the smell instead of acting like the smell isn't real to that player at that point in time. The character obviously smells the smell.</p><p></p><p>It's because the spell isn't worthless. It's niche in it's practical application because it's essentially a tool for trickery in a restricted environment.</p><p></p><p>A bard or warlock being limited in spell preparation aren't likely to take it outside of conceptual reasons. Or at least I would advise against it because of the niche aspect. A wizard who finds it and adds it to their spell book isn't hurting themselves in doing so and might use the spell occasionally now that they can swap it in on a short rest. A druid might prep the spell on a day when they plan on using it.</p><p></p><p>The illusion looks, sounds, and smells real so the DM should be treating it that way until the players do something to change that.</p><p></p><p>Mirage arcane is similar but it's range is huge, it's area is huge, it's duration is long, it also doesn't require concentration, and it does add that tactile component that came up.</p><p></p><p>Remember, there isn't a saving throw for these spells. They're just terrain features until such time as the players specifically take an action to investigate them. A person needs to be careful with the tactile aspects of hallucinatory terrain but not mirage arcane.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 9443231, member: 6750235"] There is no save to make. It's that check after taking that action. If people in the campaign are spending actions constantly investigating everything as they travel they're going to travel rather slowly, lol. We need to ask ourselves why and how someone might investigate from a distance, or how they interact. Hallucinatory terrain isn't anything more than another terrain feature for characters to see until after they take that action when there's no reason to take that action in the first place. It's also a large area, long duration, and unlike most illusions doesn't require concentration. Most people go around that stuff if they can to avoid it. I have yet to see a fighter find a tar pit and say "I gotta get me into some of that" instead of going safely around it. A bog that replicates the smell of rotten eggs would register as poisonous and potentially dangerous to someone familiar with the concept. The DM should be describing the illusion as if it's real within the senses of the players. So if there's a smell that's dangerous because toxic fumes exist within gassy swamps then the DM might call for a survival check regarding the smell instead of acting like the smell isn't real to that player at that point in time. The character obviously smells the smell. It's because the spell isn't worthless. It's niche in it's practical application because it's essentially a tool for trickery in a restricted environment. A bard or warlock being limited in spell preparation aren't likely to take it outside of conceptual reasons. Or at least I would advise against it because of the niche aspect. A wizard who finds it and adds it to their spell book isn't hurting themselves in doing so and might use the spell occasionally now that they can swap it in on a short rest. A druid might prep the spell on a day when they plan on using it. The illusion looks, sounds, and smells real so the DM should be treating it that way until the players do something to change that. Mirage arcane is similar but it's range is huge, it's area is huge, it's duration is long, it also doesn't require concentration, and it does add that tactile component that came up. Remember, there isn't a saving throw for these spells. They're just terrain features until such time as the players specifically take an action to investigate them. A person needs to be careful with the tactile aspects of hallucinatory terrain but not mirage arcane. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Cause Fear still a 1st level spell in 2024?
Top