Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NiClerigo" data-source="post: 7657961" data-attributes="member: 6701481">&quot;It would be a great idea for WOTC to have an adventure path in each classic setting, starting with Greyhawk then moving on to Planescape, Eberron, etc. Setting books can often be boring to read. Adventures often have too little setting detail for a GM to flesh out the world.Read more: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?409052-Is-Chris-Perkins-Working-On-A-New-D-amp-D-Setting/page5#ixzz3PaWONyQ8" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?409052-Is-Chris-Perkins-Working-On-A-New-D-amp-D-Setting/page5#ixzz3PaWONyQ8</a>&quot;While I love campaign setting books, especially because I prefer an open sandbox style of DMing which can be done being familiar with different aspects of the world (especially my favorite, Eberron), I admit that this is a sound idea. If they have been releasing and outsourcing the writing of adventures, why can they not publish future adventures set elsewhere, in settings different from the Realms I am not so interested in? I will not buy a FR adventure, for sure, but different adventures in different worlds could appeal to different players and highlight different aspects and possibilities of D&amp;D games and styles. Furthermore, for instance, they could outsource adventures in other worlds to their creators or those who have worked on them, e.g. asking the great Keith Baker to write the respective Eberron one.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NiClerigo, post: 7657961, member: 6701481"] "[COLOR=#000000]It would be a great idea for WOTC to have an adventure path in each classic setting, starting with Greyhawk then moving on to Planescape, Eberron, etc. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000]Setting books can often be boring to read. Adventures often have too little setting detail for a GM to flesh out the world.[/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] Read more: [URL]http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?409052-Is-Chris-Perkins-Working-On-A-New-D-amp-D-Setting/page5#ixzz3PaWONyQ8[/URL]" [/COLOR] While I love campaign setting books, especially because I prefer an open sandbox style of DMing which can be done being familiar with different aspects of the world (especially my favorite, Eberron), I admit that this is a sound idea. If they have been releasing and outsourcing the writing of adventures, why can they not publish future adventures set elsewhere, in settings different from the Realms I am not so interested in? I will not buy a FR adventure, for sure, but different adventures in different worlds could appeal to different players and highlight different aspects and possibilities of D&D games and styles. Furthermore, for instance, they could outsource adventures in other worlds to their creators or those who have worked on them, e.g. asking the great Keith Baker to write the respective Eberron one. [/QUOTE]

Verification