Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is it WotC’s responsibility to bring people to the hobby?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Argyle King" data-source="post: 5980574" data-attributes="member: 58416"><p>I am not sure if I agree that D&D is still the flagship product when it comes to rpgs in general. Is it the biggest brand name? Yes, I would say so -in spite of several competitors making a lot of progress. However, I am not sure that I would say it is currently the best product, and I am also not sure that I would currently say it <em>should</em> be the product in the lead. When I first learned to play rpgs, RPG was more-or-less synonymous with D&D; I no longer feel that is the case.</p><p></p><p>I believe the hobby would be far healthier if players, GMs, and the gamer community as a whole chose to support games based on quality and what they like to play rather than buying out of name recognition. I feel that this whole idea that D&D needs to be healthy is something of a self-defeating problem. If another game (and company) were supported, they would rise to take the place of WoTC when it comes to rpgs, and there would be a 'gateway game' and all of those other things.</p><p></p><p>Some people argue that D&D is necessary because that is the easiest game to find players for. However, part of the reason it is easy to find players for it is because there are (or at least appear to be) so many voices advocating buying the game just to buy the game. It seems logical to me that other games would be easier to find players for if the community would advocate buying (or at least trying) those games rather than being stuck on the idea that we have to buy a certain product from a certain company if we want our hobby to be healthy.</p><p></p><p>There are plenty of good companies and products out there. Why not support some of them? In recent years, Paizo has done very well, and I think that is just a small glimpse of what kind of power consumers have. Even if you don't like their product, the fact is that they showed it is possible for the hobby to survive without WoTC. </p><p></p><p>Look at the Ennie nominations for some ideas if you are unfamiliar with some of the other companies which are producing rpgs. There are a few companies other than Paizo and WoTC who have been nominated for multiple categories.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Argyle King, post: 5980574, member: 58416"] I am not sure if I agree that D&D is still the flagship product when it comes to rpgs in general. Is it the biggest brand name? Yes, I would say so -in spite of several competitors making a lot of progress. However, I am not sure that I would say it is currently the best product, and I am also not sure that I would currently say it [I]should[/I] be the product in the lead. When I first learned to play rpgs, RPG was more-or-less synonymous with D&D; I no longer feel that is the case. I believe the hobby would be far healthier if players, GMs, and the gamer community as a whole chose to support games based on quality and what they like to play rather than buying out of name recognition. I feel that this whole idea that D&D needs to be healthy is something of a self-defeating problem. If another game (and company) were supported, they would rise to take the place of WoTC when it comes to rpgs, and there would be a 'gateway game' and all of those other things. Some people argue that D&D is necessary because that is the easiest game to find players for. However, part of the reason it is easy to find players for it is because there are (or at least appear to be) so many voices advocating buying the game just to buy the game. It seems logical to me that other games would be easier to find players for if the community would advocate buying (or at least trying) those games rather than being stuck on the idea that we have to buy a certain product from a certain company if we want our hobby to be healthy. There are plenty of good companies and products out there. Why not support some of them? In recent years, Paizo has done very well, and I think that is just a small glimpse of what kind of power consumers have. Even if you don't like their product, the fact is that they showed it is possible for the hobby to survive without WoTC. Look at the Ennie nominations for some ideas if you are unfamiliar with some of the other companies which are producing rpgs. There are a few companies other than Paizo and WoTC who have been nominated for multiple categories. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is it WotC’s responsibility to bring people to the hobby?
Top