F foxylady First Post Feb 14, 2005 #1 I think they (Medusa's gaze, etc) should be, given the nature of the effect and the obvious similarity to Flesh to Stone, but I can't find any support for the position in the RAW.
I think they (Medusa's gaze, etc) should be, given the nature of the effect and the obvious similarity to Flesh to Stone, but I can't find any support for the position in the RAW.
Altamont Ravenard Explorer Feb 15, 2005 #2 What's more, the Flesh to Stone spell doesn't even specify that it imposes the "Petrified" condition on an unfortunate target... I can't find info that would prove nor contradict the fact that a Medusa's gaze would be a Transmutation effect (I think it should) AR
What's more, the Flesh to Stone spell doesn't even specify that it imposes the "Petrified" condition on an unfortunate target... I can't find info that would prove nor contradict the fact that a Medusa's gaze would be a Transmutation effect (I think it should) AR
dcollins Explorer Feb 15, 2005 #3 I would definitely rule that it's a Transmutation effect, just like flesh to stone.