hong stick.hong said:I'm keeping track of all those people using hong as a verb. Yes.
hong said:I'm keeping track of all those people using hong as a verb. Yes.
No, that's not okay. Words have different meanings in different contexts. Some words are by themselves problems; other words are only problems when used in certain contexts.w_earle_wheeler said:So, just to clarify, it's OK if I write a thread titled "My Half-Orc Paladin Pisses on Bitches" and it will be OK, right?
I think we debated this once in my theodicy class.Pielorinho said:If you don't see moderation happen, that doesn't mean it didn't happen.
w_earle_wheeler said:So, just to clarify, it's OK if I write a thread titled "My Half-Orc Paladin Pisses on Bitches" and it will be OK, right?
I'm sorry, earle, but that's not it. We're not going to break each word down according to which definitions are acceptable to use. Instead, I'm going to need to refer you back to the rules of membership. Please reread those rules. They're intentionally vague precisely so that we don't have to get into this sort of minutia. This is a situation where we need our board members to display good judgment, not to try to codify every possible situation.w_earle_wheeler said:OK, so, "piss" in reference to bodily functions is not OK (we'll put that in the same category as the S-word [not sword]).
Pielorinho said:I'm sorry, earle, but that's not it. We're not going to break each word down according to which definitions are acceptable to use. Instead, I'm going to need to refer you back to the rules of membership. Please reread those rules. They're intentionally vague precisely so that we don't have to get into this sort of minutia. This is a situation where we need our board members to display good judgment, not to try to codify every possible situation.
Daniel