Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nugan" data-source="post: 2560409" data-attributes="member: 36335">Alright, I don't visit Wizards anymore, but I was directed to this thread by someone on my site ([edited]), and, seeing as its an attack, I figured I'd answer it:First of all, [edited] does not have moderators, it may at some later date, but it does not have them now. We have two Admins: Myself and Yanen.Secondly, please do not make comments based on secondhand information. If you want to go to my site, and then complaign about it, that's fine, just don't regurgitate other people's complaints without checking up on them yourself. In my entire time as Admin of [edited], I have recieved only one email of complaint from a member (That's out of dozens of members), and that turned out to be a mistake.Third, during my time at Wizards, I was one of the biggest supporters of etiquite. I frequently made posts asking older member to be more compasionate and understanding towards new members. I asked for a loosening of many of the setting rules, which were causing causing new player to act out, not because they were &quot;bad players&quot;, but because there was simply too great a barrier to new players wishing to join. In fact, a lot of what you said about etyiquite are things I said on posts on these boards months ago.These are all ideas I kept in mind in creating [edited]. Now, [edited] is an &quot;R&quot; rated site (which is why I didn't link straight too it in this post), so there are things allowed which might be looked down upon by some WotC regulars, but this does not mean we are somehow less polite or less considerate of our members concerns than Wizards. In fact, as a small site not owned my a mega-corperation, and cared for by active administrators who are always open to its members opinions and looking for new ways to improve the site, we really are more considerate of our members.Please don't level attacks on sites on incomplete information.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nugan, post: 2560409, member: 36335"] Alright, I don't visit Wizards anymore, but I was directed to this thread by someone on my site ([edited]), and, seeing as its an attack, I figured I'd answer it: First of all, [edited] does not have moderators, it may at some later date, but it does not have them now. We have two Admins: Myself and Yanen. Secondly, please do not make comments based on secondhand information. If you want to go to my site, and then complaign about it, that's fine, just don't regurgitate other people's complaints without checking up on them yourself. In my entire time as Admin of [edited], I have recieved only one email of complaint from a member (That's out of dozens of members), and that turned out to be a mistake. Third, during my time at Wizards, I was one of the biggest supporters of etiquite. I frequently made posts asking older member to be more compasionate and understanding towards new members. I asked for a loosening of many of the setting rules, which were causing causing new player to act out, not because they were "bad players", but because there was simply too great a barrier to new players wishing to join. In fact, a lot of what you said about etyiquite are things I said on posts on these boards months ago. These are all ideas I kept in mind in creating [edited]. Now, [edited] is an "R" rated site (which is why I didn't link straight too it in this post), so there are things allowed which might be looked down upon by some WotC regulars, but this does not mean we are somehow less polite or less considerate of our members concerns than Wizards. In fact, as a small site not owned my a mega-corperation, and cared for by active administrators who are always open to its members opinions and looking for new ways to improve the site, we really are more considerate of our members. Please don't level attacks on sites on incomplete information. [/QUOTE]

Verification