Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 8919203" data-attributes="member: 7030563">DDB post from Kyle Brink today:1. Not revoking 1.0a2. Releasing entire 5E SRD on creative commons&quot;This Creative Commons license makes the content freely available for any use. We don't control that license and cannot alter or revoke it. It's open and irrevocable in a way that doesn't require you to take our word for it. And its openness means there's no need for a VTT policy. Placing the SRD under a Creative Commons license is a one-way door. There's no going back.&quot;This is what we wanted and it represents a clear reversal from WOTC along with a mea culpa.&nbsp; Putting the SRD under CC is one heck of a show of good faith.&nbsp; I asked for that in the survey, as presumably others did, but I am surprised they did it.Going forward IMO WOTC can do what they want with ONE.&nbsp; Obviously I would like that to be open as&nbsp; well, but at the end of the day it is up to them and putting a new game under a closed license does not represent the same sort of break in trust that putting 5E under it would have been.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 8919203, member: 7030563"] DDB post from Kyle Brink today: 1. Not revoking 1.0a 2. Releasing entire 5E SRD on creative commons [I]"This Creative Commons license makes the content freely available for any use. We don't control that license and cannot alter or revoke it. It's open and irrevocable in a way that doesn't require you to take our word for it. And its openness means there's no need for a VTT policy. Placing the SRD under a Creative Commons license is a one-way door. There's no going back."[/I] This is what we wanted and it represents a clear reversal from WOTC along with a mea culpa. Putting the SRD under CC is one heck of a show of good faith. I asked for that in the survey, as presumably others did, but I am surprised they did it. Going forward IMO WOTC can do what they want with ONE. Obviously I would like that to be open as well, but at the end of the day it is up to them and putting a new game under a closed license does not represent the same sort of break in trust that putting 5E under it would have been. [/QUOTE]

Verification