Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Enrahim2" data-source="post: 8926537" data-attributes="member: 7039850">I think this is the crux of what I think went wrong. My claim was that there was &quot;significant&quot; lawyer resources put into this. From my understanding there was a dedicated lawyer working closely with a business representative trying to make a draft based on very exotic requirements determined by committee between potential competitors. In addition I got the impression that those potential competitors also had their lawyers scrutinize it and got a thumbs up. This appear to be more resources than what the average indie developer could pour into trying to make a custom license for their system, and hence &quot;significant&quot;.However as you point out the quest they embarked on was very far from trivial, and it is in hindsight quite obvious that the amount of lawyer resources put into it was far from adequate if the intention had been to build a legally solid foundation for an entire industry. However my impression is that that was not the ambition for the OGL. Rather it appear mostly as a truce and a legal framework allowing for some cross use. You can hardly blame the initial drafters and approvers for failing to account for what sort of runaway success the license would be, or that WotC would completely neglect the responsibility put on them for updating the license as needed.As I read it the itention for the legalese was at that stage mainly a tool to build sufficient trust for various companies daring to work together on the business side. And for this it appear to have been quite successful. And if the legal document is good enough to fulfill it's intention, why throw more legal resources on it?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Enrahim2, post: 8926537, member: 7039850"] I think this is the crux of what I think went wrong. My claim was that there was "significant" lawyer resources put into this. From my understanding there was a dedicated lawyer working closely with a business representative trying to make a draft based on very exotic requirements determined by committee between potential competitors. In addition I got the impression that those potential competitors also had their lawyers scrutinize it and got a thumbs up. This appear to be more resources than what the average indie developer could pour into trying to make a custom license for their system, and hence "significant". However as you point out the quest they embarked on was very far from trivial, and it is in hindsight quite obvious that the amount of lawyer resources put into it was far from [I]adequate[/I] if the intention had been to build a legally solid foundation for an entire industry. However my impression is that that was not the ambition for the OGL. Rather it appear mostly as a truce and a legal framework allowing for some cross use. You can hardly blame the initial drafters and approvers for failing to account for what sort of runaway success the license would be, or that WotC would completely neglect the responsibility put on them for updating the license as needed. As I read it the [I]itention[/I] for the legalese was at that stage mainly a tool to build sufficient trust for various companies daring to work together on the business side. And for this it appear to have been quite successful. And if the legal document is good enough to fulfill it's intention, why throw more legal resources on it? [/QUOTE]

Verification