Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheAlkaizer" data-source="post: 8926993" data-attributes="member: 7024893"><p>And WotC profited from that ecosystem at least as much as the ecosystem did their product. It's mutualism.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry but no. They did not <em>try to reel back some of their rights</em>, the draft that was leaked had some absolutely outrageous clauses by almost any measure. I mentioned it in another thread - but I would have understood them asking for a cut of profits for products built on their framework. I would not have agreed with it, but I would have understood. But the amount they asked was outrageous, the clauses concerning the copyrights of content built on the OGL was outrageous, them asking you to waive rights like a jury was outrageous, the clauses about allowing them to jump in any lawsuits over third party creators was outrageous.</p><p></p><p></p><p>WotC releases their content under 1.0a, which following the SRD allows you to redistribute a small amount of their content and to make content yourself which reference some key components and concepts from the game. Paizo allows every rule, player option, feats of every single book they have released available online. The parts they don't allow are lore and arts if I recall.</p><p></p><p>Admittedly, these two things are different. But Pathfinder 2E also used the OGL and they also have a much bigger SRD. Having their content available for free is only the cherry on top.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If there's one thing that came out of this whole OGL debacle, it is that this is arguable and nobody knows. It probably did at some point, but we don't know if it still does. WotC did not pull the trigger, it did not lead to lawsuits and so we have no idea. My absolutely unprofessional reading of the situation is that twenty years later, no Paizo does not need the OGL to make Pathfinder. We'll actually see that happen soon with new printings omitting it if I recall.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What? Every single Pathfinder 2E and Starfinder books, which are much more numerous than 5E books, are under the OGL. And as mentioned, both SRDs are waaaay more permissive than 5E's.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheAlkaizer, post: 8926993, member: 7024893"] And WotC profited from that ecosystem at least as much as the ecosystem did their product. It's mutualism. Sorry but no. They did not [I]try to reel back some of their rights[/I], the draft that was leaked had some absolutely outrageous clauses by almost any measure. I mentioned it in another thread - but I would have understood them asking for a cut of profits for products built on their framework. I would not have agreed with it, but I would have understood. But the amount they asked was outrageous, the clauses concerning the copyrights of content built on the OGL was outrageous, them asking you to waive rights like a jury was outrageous, the clauses about allowing them to jump in any lawsuits over third party creators was outrageous. WotC releases their content under 1.0a, which following the SRD allows you to redistribute a small amount of their content and to make content yourself which reference some key components and concepts from the game. Paizo allows every rule, player option, feats of every single book they have released available online. The parts they don't allow are lore and arts if I recall. Admittedly, these two things are different. But Pathfinder 2E also used the OGL and they also have a much bigger SRD. Having their content available for free is only the cherry on top. If there's one thing that came out of this whole OGL debacle, it is that this is arguable and nobody knows. It probably did at some point, but we don't know if it still does. WotC did not pull the trigger, it did not lead to lawsuits and so we have no idea. My absolutely unprofessional reading of the situation is that twenty years later, no Paizo does not need the OGL to make Pathfinder. We'll actually see that happen soon with new printings omitting it if I recall. What? Every single Pathfinder 2E and Starfinder books, which are much more numerous than 5E books, are under the OGL. And as mentioned, both SRDs are waaaay more permissive than 5E's. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.
Top