Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Corporate Dog" data-source="post: 8928852" data-attributes="member: 2512">I don’t play much D&amp;D. My tie to various editions is 100% based on what their licensing says I can use, should the creative bug hit me.So I own the 3.5 core rulebooks, own nothing from 4e (as much as I’d love to write something based on it), and came back for 5e (which I still thought had somewhat of a lacking SRD).All the words flying around regarding ‘trust’ and ‘betrayal’ and ‘forgiveness’ don’t hit home for me at all. The simple question for me is, “Can I use what I want in their licensing?”Creative Commons licensing implies, “Yes, and they can’t pull the rug out from beneath you again either.” So I’m mostly happy with that resolution.But what I’m really jazzed about are all of the other systems looking at covering their rules under other open licenses (like ORC). Wizards’ screw-up could be the harbinger of a new golden age of third-party publishing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Corporate Dog, post: 8928852, member: 2512"] I don’t play much D&D. My tie to various editions is 100% based on what their licensing says I can use, should the creative bug hit me. So I own the 3.5 core rulebooks, own nothing from 4e (as much as I’d love to write something based on it), and came back for 5e (which I still thought had somewhat of a lacking SRD). All the words flying around regarding ‘trust’ and ‘betrayal’ and ‘forgiveness’ don’t hit home for me at all. The simple question for me is, “Can I use what I want in their licensing?” Creative Commons licensing implies, “Yes, and they can’t pull the rug out from beneath you again either.” So I’m mostly happy with that resolution. But what I’m really jazzed about are all of the other systems looking at covering their rules under other open licenses (like ORC). Wizards’ screw-up could be the harbinger of a new golden age of third-party publishing. [/QUOTE]

Verification