Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8859418" data-attributes="member: 6790260">No one is doing so, despite the wildly unfounded and usually insulting terms detractors use to describe us.Instead, we are saying that, and I cannot stress this enough,THE OPTIONof a game where irrevocable, permanent character death is not ENFORCED as a possible consequence for ALL tables, would be pretty nice.Of course, this molehill (if it even rises to that lofty height) is then magnified into an actively-erupting Olympus Mons somehow crushing out all other possibilities, becoming some monstrous grotesquerie that hegemonically forbids literally anyone ever from dealing with death as a consequence. Even though literally not one person in this entire thread has ever, even once, even to the tiniest degree, remotely suggested such a thing.It's not the people saying "eh, death doesn't really do it for me, I find other things much superior" that are being hegemonic and exclusionary here. Though, of course, it is the hegemonic and exclusionary who cry foul and rail against being excluded.</blockquote>