Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 6146858" data-attributes="member: 87792">Given that he was the person in specific in charge of the product (Keep on the Shadowfell) that made solos into ... just about anything, then he is carping and criticising about his own mistakes.&nbsp; While never acknowledging that it is a mistake that he is personally directly responsible for.&nbsp; As for the fact he worked on 4e, true.&nbsp; And he even gave it one of its fundamental abilities - daily powers.&nbsp; The parts of 4e he worked on are known - they have his name on them.&nbsp; I have never denied this.&nbsp; I have, however, pointed out some of what those books actually were and how they were received.You are aware that half my comments about Mike Mearls are responses to you telling me I don't have the right to say what I am?&nbsp; So I'm expanding them and pointing out where they are true.&nbsp; I believe I have made a total of two comments mentioning Mearls recently that were not in direct response to you personally telling me I was wrong to bring him up by name.&nbsp; Hardly a &quot;barrage&quot;.&nbsp; However your approach in challenging me is encouraging me to defend on my position and expand on it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 6146858, member: 87792"] Given that he was the person in specific in charge of the product (Keep on the Shadowfell) that made solos into ... just about anything, then he is carping and criticising about his own mistakes. While never acknowledging that it is a mistake that he is personally directly responsible for. As for the fact he worked on 4e, true. And he even gave it one of its fundamental abilities - daily powers. The parts of 4e he worked on are known - they have his name on them. I have never denied this. I have, however, pointed out some of what those books actually were and how they were received. You are aware that half my comments about Mike Mearls are responses to you telling me I don't have the right to say what I am? So I'm expanding them and pointing out where they are true. I believe I have made a total of two comments mentioning Mearls recently that were not in direct response to you personally telling me I was wrong to bring him up by name. Hardly a "barrage". However your approach in challenging me is encouraging me to defend on my position and expand on it. [/QUOTE]

Verification