Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
June Unearthed Arcana: Druid Shepherd, Fighter Cavalier, and Paladin of Conquest
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flamestrike" data-source="post: 7717857" data-attributes="member: 6788736"><p>You just hexed the Kings intelligence. Is he not <em>thinking</em>?</p><p></p><p>And I don't know about your game, but in my game laying a hex on someone is obvious. You are magically cursing them. Channelling the foul powers of your dark patron into them. Your eyes turn a funny colour or you hurl stream of insults at them. Whatever.</p><p></p><p>Just because an ability lacks any fluff text as what it looks like doesn't mean it doesn't look like anything. Youre free to rule in the absence of any text that says it looks like something specific that it doesn't look like anything at all, but that's up to you.</p><p></p><p>If a player in my game said he was going to lay a hex on the King, then that is an offensive action that the king gets to respond to and initiative is declared.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying you have to run it that way. Go nuts with whatever feels right to you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>To be honest you're the one who is inferring that by not including any fluff text description of what laying a hex on to someone looks like that it doesn't look like anything at all.</p><p></p><p>It might be possible to conceal the fact that you're hexing someone. But I can assure you in my game if your warlock tryed to hex someone while they were looking right at them then it would be initiative time.</p><p></p><p>And also the game is kinda described through the Paradigm of combat actions within combat encounters. Zooming out a step it is next described in the framework of the adventuring day. </p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that you have to run your game in such a way with series of discrete encounters over the course of a day and all abilities described in the context of those encounters. I'm just saying that it's pretty clear that that is the inferred framework of fifth edition D&D.</p><p></p><p>You can repudiate that and allows shenanigans like bag of rats and 20 short rests in a 20 hour period if you really want to. I'm just saying I don't think that's what the designers intended the game to be.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flamestrike, post: 7717857, member: 6788736"] You just hexed the Kings intelligence. Is he not [I]thinking[/I]? And I don't know about your game, but in my game laying a hex on someone is obvious. You are magically cursing them. Channelling the foul powers of your dark patron into them. Your eyes turn a funny colour or you hurl stream of insults at them. Whatever. Just because an ability lacks any fluff text as what it looks like doesn't mean it doesn't look like anything. Youre free to rule in the absence of any text that says it looks like something specific that it doesn't look like anything at all, but that's up to you. If a player in my game said he was going to lay a hex on the King, then that is an offensive action that the king gets to respond to and initiative is declared. I'm not saying you have to run it that way. Go nuts with whatever feels right to you. To be honest you're the one who is inferring that by not including any fluff text description of what laying a hex on to someone looks like that it doesn't look like anything at all. It might be possible to conceal the fact that you're hexing someone. But I can assure you in my game if your warlock tryed to hex someone while they were looking right at them then it would be initiative time. And also the game is kinda described through the Paradigm of combat actions within combat encounters. Zooming out a step it is next described in the framework of the adventuring day. I'm not saying that you have to run your game in such a way with series of discrete encounters over the course of a day and all abilities described in the context of those encounters. I'm just saying that it's pretty clear that that is the inferred framework of fifth edition D&D. You can repudiate that and allows shenanigans like bag of rats and 20 short rests in a 20 hour period if you really want to. I'm just saying I don't think that's what the designers intended the game to be. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
June Unearthed Arcana: Druid Shepherd, Fighter Cavalier, and Paladin of Conquest
Top