D&D 5E Justin Alexander's review of Shattered Obelisk is pretty scathing

Status
Not open for further replies.
You know, if you are giving B- to the worst adventure WotC has produced in 5e... you may be more generous/forgiving than many others. I've only seen a portion of the WotC's released adventures (a campaign takes me 1-2 years to run, what's the point of buying all of them?), and from that subset, B- would not by my floor... but perhaps that's just me?
"A work of stunning mediocrity that might be useful if you can find nothing else." "4 out of 5 stars!"
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Yeah, I don't know about an F. The first part of the adventure is a stone classic, and his criticisms of the changes are pretty nit-picky - I've hardly noticed them. The presentation is top tier, as always. Can't comment on the remainder of the story, which is not likely to be to my taste, but there's no way this is an F.

I'm a teacher. An F is without redeeming features.
The first part is obviously excellent, but I’m not sure this book deserves credit for it, since it’s 99% just a reprint. It should be evaluated on the new content, and on the changes it made to the old content, which it sounds like are very minor, but mostly either neutral or for the worse.

F is probably still much too harsh from what I’m hearing, but just saying, the reprinted material shouldn’t really be a factor in the assessment.
 

It expands on it in that it's story continues in the same area. Plot wise it doesn't need to be the same as the original which was wrapped up pretty well.
eh, in that case I can just run Icespire Peak or Princes of the Apocalypse instead, the first is in the exact same area, the other is a few miles over.

I certainly expected a better integration than this, and to add insult to injury, most of the LMoP changes just made that worse without integrating it any better
 





Yes, I watched the whole thing. The mid-stream player replacement thing was weird in itself, given that it was essentially a single game session split into 30-minute chunks. Nevertheless, that doesn't change my opinion of Matt Mercer as a DM. He's a great role model if you want to run a live streamed D&D show, but I wouldn't look to him as a great role model for a private home game.
I don't feel there's a huge difference between his being a role model for a streamed game vs a home DM. Is he a lot smoother now? Yes, he's had a ton of time to practice. But if you've ever seen Ashley Johnson's video of the original home game before the SHITs were forced to become Vox Machina, it still seems what he was doing at home, offline, tracks with what he runs now.


EDIT: Also including the video Liam recorded where Matt pitches bringing the game to streaming.
 



Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top