My opinion is most popular archetypes or concepts can't be a complete class, then a variant class. A variant class isn't a subclass, but it is a core class with a different pack of class features. (let's say variant classes are better for marketing than subclasses).
My concepto of knight is mixing the knight from player's handbook II from 3.5 ed and the cavalier from pathfinder rpg, with subclasses about orders of cavalry and some class features about to face 1 vs 1 challenge. A subclass would be something about legacy weapons or armours.
Don't care: Either stay on the topic of this port of the 4e Knight, or go make your own thread/class.
And you're ignoring that 4essentials classes are already subclasses.
Last edited: