Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="johnsemlak" data-source="post: 1984084" data-attributes="member: 7233">I think teh basic problem with that project is that it's not really necessary anyway; you can play a 3e campaign in Mystara/The Known world fairly easily, just using old materials.&nbsp; It's not really all that different than using Greyhawk at present, since the only 3e sourcebook for Greyhawk is virtually devoid of 3e crunch.IMO the main thing necessary to play would be a comprehensive reference of the dieties, with the domains, favored weapons, etc.&nbsp; Otherwise, since Mystara was pretty much vanilla D&amp;D, you just need to apply 3e over it and make a few judgements here and there.I would think the Mystara 3e project might be more successful if it had a 'bits and pieces' approach, just converting little bits (such as Mystara-based monsters, or perhaps presenting Mystaran PrCs), rathar than trying to come up with a comprehensive conversion.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="johnsemlak, post: 1984084, member: 7233"] I think teh basic problem with that project is that it's not [i]really[/i] necessary anyway; you can play a 3e campaign in Mystara/The Known world fairly easily, just using old materials. It's not really all that different than using Greyhawk at present, since the only 3e sourcebook for Greyhawk is virtually devoid of 3e crunch. IMO the main thing necessary to play would be a comprehensive reference of the dieties, with the domains, favored weapons, etc. Otherwise, since Mystara was pretty much vanilla D&D, you just need to apply 3e over it and make a few judgements here and there. I would think the Mystara 3e project might be more successful if it had a 'bits and pieces' approach, just converting little bits (such as Mystara-based monsters, or perhaps presenting Mystaran PrCs), rathar than trying to come up with a comprehensive conversion. [/QUOTE]

Verification