Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Myrdin Potter" data-source="post: 8932196" data-attributes="member: 6843593">To be clear, I have seen people defending the morality clause because of the danger of bad (hate / racist) RPG materials doing damage to the business.If you use the standards applied to Oriental Adventures (which lead to WoTC slapping a disclaimer on their older materials even though not OGL), then there is a claim of racism that probably exists for quite a few products from the same time.I don’t think those are examples of deliberate and premeditated racism. In the case of Oriental Adventures, Japanese RPG players were even consulted.So I am still looking for these bad products that make the claims in the interview of how the morality clause really was an important driver of the OGL.This is not Sealioning. I am looking for examples because there are people that are attached to the need for this and feel that it is a valid justification for the attempt to deauthorize the OGL.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Myrdin Potter, post: 8932196, member: 6843593"] To be clear, I have seen people defending the morality clause because of the danger of bad (hate / racist) RPG materials doing damage to the business. If you use the standards applied to Oriental Adventures (which lead to WoTC slapping a disclaimer on their older materials even though not OGL), then there is a claim of racism that probably exists for quite a few products from the same time. I don’t think those are examples of deliberate and premeditated racism. In the case of Oriental Adventures, Japanese RPG players were even consulted. So I am still looking for these bad products that make the claims in the interview of how the morality clause really was an important driver of the OGL. This is not Sealioning. I am looking for examples because there are people that are attached to the need for this and feel that it is a valid justification for the attempt to deauthorize the OGL. [/QUOTE]

Verification