Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 8932839" data-attributes="member: 15700">The entire discussion around that list is pretty clear what it's meant for. If a publisher even mentions how they support diversity or inclusivity, they go right to the red list, usually with a lot of folks making disparaging comments about wokeness (I won't repeat the more offensive comments, which you already know since you've been part of that discussion on that site yourself). It's no secret what is considered a green company and what is red, regardless of any outlier example you provide. Again, for clarity, I'm not saying Greg has racist or sexist material in his stuff. I'm saying he has said how he won't include any of WoTC's &quot;woke nonsense&quot; in his games.&nbsp; He's just one of many who are using the same phrases and terminology as people like LaNasa, and Ernie, and Dave, and a bunch others, so from WoTC's perspective, there are people using the OGL (or should use the OGL) who have publicly stated their vitriol towards WotC's direction of game design, which is a red flag to them. You don't have to have a bunch of examples of racist OGL stuff, you only need a credible threat it will happen to make them address like they did in the revision.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 8932839, member: 15700"] The entire discussion around that list is pretty clear what it's meant for. If a publisher even mentions how they support diversity or inclusivity, they go right to the red list, usually with a lot of folks making disparaging comments about wokeness (I won't repeat the more offensive comments, which you already know since you've been part of that discussion on that site yourself). It's no secret what is considered a green company and what is red, regardless of any outlier example you provide. Again, for clarity, I'm not saying Greg has racist or sexist material in his stuff. I'm saying he has said how he won't include any of WoTC's "woke nonsense" in his games. He's just one of many who are using the same phrases and terminology as people like LaNasa, and Ernie, and Dave, and a bunch others, so from WoTC's perspective, there are people using the OGL (or should use the OGL) who have publicly stated their vitriol towards WotC's direction of game design, which is a red flag to them. You don't have to have a bunch of examples of racist OGL stuff, you only need a credible threat it will happen to make them address like they did in the revision. [/QUOTE]

Verification