Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 8933996" data-attributes="member: 15700">Because of the slippery slope of your argument that I and others have pointed out to you.That is not what I said at all.&nbsp; I said that women have less opportunities in the workforce to climb the ladder. This is a fact.&nbsp; And therefore, there is consideration to factor that in before lambasting them for the job they chose to accept.&nbsp; I did not absolve her or say she is less culpable (I think she's less culpable because her job didn't have anything to do with the companies actual policy or decisions, but that's another topic). I was simply alerting you to the position of privilege you seem to be making by completely disregarding how women (and other marginalized groups) don't have the same opportunities as non-marginalized groups have.None of this changes the fact that you're drawing an arbitrary line of what's good and what's OK to judge people for based on your own&nbsp; personal biases and certainly not fact (as the fast food analogy discussion proved). you're entitled to your opinion, but please don't think you're taking any moral or objective high ground here.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 8933996, member: 15700"] Because of the slippery slope of your argument that I and others have pointed out to you. That is [B]not [/B]what I said at all. I said that women have less opportunities in the workforce to climb the ladder. This is a fact. And therefore, there is consideration to factor that in before lambasting them for the job they chose to accept. I did not absolve her or say she is less culpable (I think she's less culpable because her job didn't have anything to do with the companies actual policy or decisions, but that's another topic). I was simply alerting you to the position of privilege you seem to be making by completely disregarding how women (and other marginalized groups) don't have the same opportunities as non-marginalized groups have. None of this changes the fact that you're drawing an arbitrary line of what's good and what's OK to judge people for based on your own personal biases and certainly not fact (as the fast food analogy discussion proved). you're entitled to your opinion, but please don't think you're taking any moral or objective high ground here. [/QUOTE]

Verification