Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 8934308" data-attributes="member: 8461">[spoiler=&quot;just replied to the notification; hadn't seen the moderation note; no further replies will be made on this topic&quot;]There's never been a better example of the pot calling the kettle black. Talk about wild.&quot;Isn't ideal&quot; is hardly the way to describe being a high-level executive who helps a transnational corporation peddle products which sicken and kill hundreds of thousands of people every year. And we know she wasn't a mid-level anything. Here's her own description of her job responsibilities (as of 2007, when she left Altria) as taken from her LinkedIn page:Drafting multi-year plans to chart revenue in the billions, presented to the company chair and the board of directors? Not mid-level, no.<img src="https://media2.giphy.com/media/ceeN6U57leAhi/200.gif" alt="Youre Wrong John C Mcginley GIF" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />Can you cite any instance where I've &quot;refused to acknowledge&quot; anything? Spoiler alert: no, you can't. Because that's not what this is about. It's about saying that there are worse things than people who say stuff you find reprehensible, such as working for a company who knowingly puts out products which kill people.Again, hundreds of thousands of people dead from tobacco products every year. Why do you refuse to acknowledge that?Wrong again! I <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/kyle-brink-d-d-exec-producer-on-ogl-controversy-one-d-d-summary.695136/post-8933973" target="_blank">already pointed out</a> that even if that premise were granted, it wouldn't change anything with regard to the debate being had.Maybe next time, take the &quot;advice&quot; you so blithely offer to others.Not mid-tier, not objectionable, and not irrelevant. Three strikes back to back.Considering that it was in reply to your own mocking laugh, you're very welcome.[/spoiler]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 8934308, member: 8461"] [spoiler="just replied to the notification; hadn't seen the moderation note; no further replies will be made on this topic"]There's never been a better example of the pot calling the kettle black. Talk about wild. "Isn't ideal" is hardly the way to describe being a high-level executive who helps a transnational corporation peddle products which sicken and kill hundreds of thousands of people every year. And we know she wasn't a mid-level anything. Here's her own description of her job responsibilities (as of 2007, when she left Altria) as taken from her LinkedIn page: Drafting multi-year plans to chart revenue in the billions, presented to the company chair and the board of directors? Not mid-level, no. [IMG alt="Youre Wrong John C Mcginley GIF"]https://media2.giphy.com/media/ceeN6U57leAhi/200.gif[/IMG] Can you cite any instance where I've "refused to acknowledge" anything? Spoiler alert: no, you can't. Because that's not what this is about. It's about saying that there are worse things than people who say stuff you find reprehensible, such as working for a company who knowingly puts out products which kill people. Again, hundreds of thousands of people dead from tobacco products every year. Why do you refuse to acknowledge that? Wrong again! I [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/kyle-brink-d-d-exec-producer-on-ogl-controversy-one-d-d-summary.695136/post-8933973']already pointed out[/URL] that even if that premise were granted, it wouldn't change anything with regard to the debate being had. Maybe next time, take the "advice" you so blithely offer to others. Not mid-tier, not objectionable, and not irrelevant. Three strikes back to back. Considering that it was in reply to your own mocking laugh, you're very welcome.[/spoiler] [/QUOTE]

Verification