Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[L&L] Campaigns in D&D Next
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sage Genesis" data-source="post: 6249293" data-attributes="member: 6706099"><p>I'm not sure where you're going with this but I'll answer just the same.</p><p></p><p>It's not a simple matter of "like" or "dislike" of the game. I already like a lot of what I've seen of Next. I like the ease of character creation. I like some of the class abilities. I like backgrounds. And so on. It's quite rare for me to like or dislike the entirety of a game, the issue is more whether overall I like enough elements for me to justify a purchase. Similarly, I also dislike certain elements of 4e that I think could've been handled better on launch or even still need to be handled better today. It's just that overall I like enough elements to buy and play it.</p><p></p><p>What the odds are of me liking enough of 5e/Next? I rightly don't know. Maybe around 50-50, but even if it falls to the side of "no purchase", that doesn't have to mean I dislike the entire thing. I expect to still like some elements.</p><p></p><p>My current annoyance is not so much with the elements of the game I might dislike, though. I dislike some comments and behavior of the development team. I dislike the way modularity is put forth as a grand solution to many ills even though we haven't seen any kind of real modularity yet. Some options and houserule potential, but if that qualifies as "modularity" then a product like Unearthed Arcana is also "modularity". And the d20 days with all its 3rd party supplements and compatibilities would have been <em>much</em> more modular than anything Next is doing.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I should also clarify that I think the dev's edition warrior tendencies are not so much a result of malice and more of marketing. The launch of 4e is pretty infamous because a lot of 3e fans felt that WotC was mocking their beloved game, talking trash about it in order to sell them on the new edition. There was backlash over that and I see the current talks as an attempt to do the same again, just more subtly to prevent as much backlash. Talking garbage about warlords shouting hands back on is in my view meant as an appeal to people who intensely dislike 4e. That doesn't mean WotC doesn't understand how 4e healing actually is supposed work, they're just repeating the sales tactic of before in a way that makes it less easy to call them on it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sage Genesis, post: 6249293, member: 6706099"] I'm not sure where you're going with this but I'll answer just the same. It's not a simple matter of "like" or "dislike" of the game. I already like a lot of what I've seen of Next. I like the ease of character creation. I like some of the class abilities. I like backgrounds. And so on. It's quite rare for me to like or dislike the entirety of a game, the issue is more whether overall I like enough elements for me to justify a purchase. Similarly, I also dislike certain elements of 4e that I think could've been handled better on launch or even still need to be handled better today. It's just that overall I like enough elements to buy and play it. What the odds are of me liking enough of 5e/Next? I rightly don't know. Maybe around 50-50, but even if it falls to the side of "no purchase", that doesn't have to mean I dislike the entire thing. I expect to still like some elements. My current annoyance is not so much with the elements of the game I might dislike, though. I dislike some comments and behavior of the development team. I dislike the way modularity is put forth as a grand solution to many ills even though we haven't seen any kind of real modularity yet. Some options and houserule potential, but if that qualifies as "modularity" then a product like Unearthed Arcana is also "modularity". And the d20 days with all its 3rd party supplements and compatibilities would have been [i]much[/i] more modular than anything Next is doing. I should also clarify that I think the dev's edition warrior tendencies are not so much a result of malice and more of marketing. The launch of 4e is pretty infamous because a lot of 3e fans felt that WotC was mocking their beloved game, talking trash about it in order to sell them on the new edition. There was backlash over that and I see the current talks as an attempt to do the same again, just more subtly to prevent as much backlash. Talking garbage about warlords shouting hands back on is in my view meant as an appeal to people who intensely dislike 4e. That doesn't mean WotC doesn't understand how 4e healing actually is supposed work, they're just repeating the sales tactic of before in a way that makes it less easy to call them on it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[L&L] Campaigns in D&D Next
Top